Honeybees solve a multi-comparison ranking task by probability matching

HaDi MaBouDi, James A. R. Marshall, Andrew B. Barron*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    8 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Honeybees forage on diverse flowers which vary in the amount and type of rewards they offer, and bees are challenged with maximizing the resources they gather for their colony. That bees are effective foragers is clear, but how bees solve this type of complex multi-choice task is unknown. Here, we set bees a five-comparison choice task in which five colours differed in their probability of offering reward and punishment. The colours were ranked such that high ranked colours were more likely to offer reward, and the ranking was unambiguous. Bees' choices in unrewarded tests matched their individual experiences of reward and punishment of each colour, indicating bees solved this test not by comparing or ranking colours but by basing their colour choices on their history of reinforcement for each colour. Computational modelling suggests a structure like the honeybee mushroom body with reinforcement-related plasticity at both input and output can be sufficient for this cognitive strategy. We discuss how probability matching enables effective choices to be made without a need to compare any stimuli directly, and the use and limitations of this simple cognitive strategy for foraging animals.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number20201525
    Pages (from-to)1-9
    Number of pages9
    JournalProceedings. Biological sciences
    Volume287
    Issue number1934
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 9 Sept 2020

    Keywords

    • colour learning
    • ecological rationality
    • multi-armed bandit task
    • mushroom body
    • probability matching
    • reinforcement learning

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Honeybees solve a multi-comparison ranking task by probability matching'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this