How constitutional crowdsourcing can enhance legitimacy in constitution making

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This chapter assesses how constitutional crowdsourcing can enhance legitimacy in processes of constitution making and amending in stable democracies. Constitutional crowdsourcing gives rise to opportunities and challenges. It opens-up fresh possibilities for participation by individuals and groups previously excluded from constitution-making deliberation, expression of political preferences, and decisions. It may also increase autonomy, equality, and transparency. However, at the same time, these kinds of strategies create the challenge of establishing constraints for securing these possibilities and ensuring that the relevant agents engage in a meaningful way. Legitimacy qua justifiability about constitution-making processes depends on overcoming this challenge.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationComparative constitution making
EditorsDavid Landau, Hannah Lerner
Place of PublicationCheltenham, UK ; Northampton, USA
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing
Chapter11
Pages235-256
Number of pages21
ISBN (Electronic)9781785365263
ISBN (Print)9781785365256
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019
Externally publishedYes

Publication series

NameResearch Handbooks in Comparative Constitutional Law
PublisherEdward Elgar

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How constitutional crowdsourcing can enhance legitimacy in constitution making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this