Abstract
This qualitative study aimed to identify common stress beliefs. Undergraduate psychology students (N = 35) completed semi-structured interviews discussing the sensations, causes, purpose, valence, consequences, control, and timeline of stress. Interviews were analysed via double-coded thematic analysis employing a latent, inductive, and realist framework. Five themes (cognition, emotion, physical health, interpersonal relations, and behaviour) and 17 subthemes were identified. Themes and subthemes were validated in a Delphi study of experts in stress research (N = 14). Many of these identified beliefs have not been incorporated into current measures of stress beliefs, suggesting the need for new approaches to measuring this construct.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2756– 2767 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Journal of Health Psychology |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 14 |
| Early online date | 12 Jun 2020 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2021 |
Keywords
- beliefs
- psychological distress
- qualitative methods
- stress
- stress-related growth
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'How do you think about stress? A qualitative analysis of beliefs about stress'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver