How executive remuneration responds to guidance: evidence from the Australian banking industry

Shane Magee, Cheok Man Ng, Sue Wright*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study investigates whether executive remuneration responds to regulatory guidance. Using an exogenous shock in the form of a regulatory guideline issued by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority to the Australian banking industry, we analyse whether remuneration is more aligned to prudent risk-taking since the guideline was published. We find that remuneration to both chief executive officers and the top five highest paid executives was adjusted to be more consistent with the guideline from its first year of operation. These findings are robust to the introduction of the Two Strikes Rule as an alternative explanation.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages27
JournalAccounting and Finance
Early online date11 Feb 2021
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 11 Feb 2021

Keywords

  • Banks
  • Governance
  • Remuneration

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'How executive remuneration responds to guidance: evidence from the Australian banking industry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this