How good are skin cancer clinics at melanoma detection? Number needed to treat variability across a national clinic group in Australia

Craig Hansen*, David Wilkinson, Mary Hansen, Giuseppe Argenziano

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

70 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The number needed to treat (NNT) is a key measure of the quality of melanoma diagnosis. There are few data on this measure from primary care skin cancer clinics in Australia. Objective: We sought to report the NNT from a large pathology database and examine several patient characteristics. Methods: We calculated NNT by doctor and clinic among 10,612 lesions, 6796 patients, 57 doctors, and 15 clinics from a pathology database. NNT was calculated with and without seborrheic keratoses. Results: Overall NNT was 30 (with seborrheic keratoses) and 23 (without seborrheic keratoses). Excluding the 4 doctors with NNT greater than 60, total NNT decreased from 30 to 21 and from 23 to 15, respectively (with and without seborrheic keratoses). NNT was higher for female patients and younger patients (<30 years). NNT varied by doctor from 0 to 192 and 117, respectively (with and without seborrheic keratoses). Limitations: Given the retrospective design, we were unable to examine doctor characteristics such as age, sex, medical training, and patient pressure to excise. Conclusions: Substantial variability in individual doctor NNT produced an overall NNT similar to that reported from mainstream general practice, and higher than specialist practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)599-604
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume61
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2009
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • melanoma
  • number needed to treat
  • skin cancer

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'How good are skin cancer clinics at melanoma detection? Number needed to treat variability across a national clinic group in Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this