TY - JOUR
T1 - How is test-related information communicated in Australian Emergency Departments?
T2 - ED clinicians’ and patients’ perspectives
AU - Dahm, Maria R.
AU - Li, Julie
AU - Thomas, Judith
AU - Smith , Peter
AU - Georgiou, Andrew
PY - 2021/8
Y1 - 2021/8
N2 - Objectives: To investigate the communication processes involving test-related information in Australian Emergency Departments (EDs); specifically what and how ED clinicians communicate test-related information to patients, what patients know and understand about the provided information, and how patients view the potential to access their test-results electronically. Methods: We conducted face-to-face semi-structured interviews with clinicians (n = 26) and patients (n = 32) across three Australian EDs. Interviews were transcribed and analysed iteratively, following principles of qualitative content analysis and grounded theory. Results: Depending on various contextual (e.g. time pressures) and patient factors (e.g. perceived health literacy), ED clinicians provided, and patients recalled receiving, test-related information along a continuum, ranging from “no or limited” information to “specific” information. Many patients were confused about how to access their test-results. Patients welcomed the potential for future electronic access to results but viewed their individual health and/or computer literacy skills and knowledge as potential barriers. Conclusions: EDs are highly dynamic environments where contextual forces impinge on the amount and quality of test-related information that clinicians communicate to ED patients. Practice Implications: Systemic and patient factors need to be addressed to optimise the provision of test-related information in ED settings, improve patient understanding and foster patient empowerment.
AB - Objectives: To investigate the communication processes involving test-related information in Australian Emergency Departments (EDs); specifically what and how ED clinicians communicate test-related information to patients, what patients know and understand about the provided information, and how patients view the potential to access their test-results electronically. Methods: We conducted face-to-face semi-structured interviews with clinicians (n = 26) and patients (n = 32) across three Australian EDs. Interviews were transcribed and analysed iteratively, following principles of qualitative content analysis and grounded theory. Results: Depending on various contextual (e.g. time pressures) and patient factors (e.g. perceived health literacy), ED clinicians provided, and patients recalled receiving, test-related information along a continuum, ranging from “no or limited” information to “specific” information. Many patients were confused about how to access their test-results. Patients welcomed the potential for future electronic access to results but viewed their individual health and/or computer literacy skills and knowledge as potential barriers. Conclusions: EDs are highly dynamic environments where contextual forces impinge on the amount and quality of test-related information that clinicians communicate to ED patients. Practice Implications: Systemic and patient factors need to be addressed to optimise the provision of test-related information in ED settings, improve patient understanding and foster patient empowerment.
KW - Communication
KW - Diagnostic testing
KW - Emergency department
KW - Patient empowerment
KW - Health services research
KW - Qualitative research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099811234&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1111925
U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2021.01.009
DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2021.01.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 33500178
SN - 0738-3991
VL - 104
SP - 1970
EP - 1977
JO - Patient Education and Counseling
JF - Patient Education and Counseling
IS - 8
ER -