How social is error observation? The neural mechanisms underlying the observation of human and machine errors

Charlotte Desmet*, Eliane Deschrijver, Marcel Brass

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Citations (Scopus)
32 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Recently, it has been shown that the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) is involved in error execution as well as error observation. Based on this finding, it has been argued that recognizing each other's mistakes might rely on motor simulation. In the current functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, we directly tested this hypothesis by investigating whether medial prefrontal activity in error observation is restricted to situations that enable simulation. To this aim, we compared brain activity related to the observation of errors that can be simulated (human errors) with brain activity related to errors that cannot be simulated (machine errors). We show that medial prefrontal activity is not only restricted to the observation of human errors but also occurs when observing errors of a machine. In addition, our data indicate that the MPFC reflects a domain general mechanism of monitoring violations of expectancies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)427-435
Number of pages9
JournalSocial Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2014
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2013. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • error
  • action observation
  • medial prefrontal cortex
  • simulation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How social is error observation? The neural mechanisms underlying the observation of human and machine errors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this