How useful are port surveys focused on target pest identification for exotic species management?

M. J. Bishop, P. A. Hutchings

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Monitoring surveys are an important tool for detecting new arrivals of exotic species, for documenting patterns of invasion, and exotic species impacts. Faced with time and cost constraints, these surveys are increasingly focused on lists of target pest species, identified as being most likely to arrive and cause significant harm. We used the national survey of Australian international ports for introduced marine pests as a case study to assess: (1) the taxonomic rigor of surveys focused on detection of target species; and (2) how the ability of port surveys to inform invasion patterns is dependent on taxonomic approach. Our analysis of the 46 available reports revealed common sub-optimal taxonomic practices that compromised their utility to identify abiotic conditions that are good predictors of biological invasion. Thus, although surveys for target species may provide information on the distribution of a handful of species, they may fail to do much else.

LanguageEnglish
Pages36-42
Number of pages7
JournalMarine Pollution Bulletin
Volume62
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2011

Fingerprint

pest identification
pests
national surveys
pest species
biological invasion
biogeography
exotic species
pest
case studies
monitoring
Monitoring
cost

Cite this

@article{9f016014aa1f4ce0a3e7cf57514767ab,
title = "How useful are port surveys focused on target pest identification for exotic species management?",
abstract = "Monitoring surveys are an important tool for detecting new arrivals of exotic species, for documenting patterns of invasion, and exotic species impacts. Faced with time and cost constraints, these surveys are increasingly focused on lists of target pest species, identified as being most likely to arrive and cause significant harm. We used the national survey of Australian international ports for introduced marine pests as a case study to assess: (1) the taxonomic rigor of surveys focused on detection of target species; and (2) how the ability of port surveys to inform invasion patterns is dependent on taxonomic approach. Our analysis of the 46 available reports revealed common sub-optimal taxonomic practices that compromised their utility to identify abiotic conditions that are good predictors of biological invasion. Thus, although surveys for target species may provide information on the distribution of a handful of species, they may fail to do much else.",
author = "Bishop, {M. J.} and Hutchings, {P. A.}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.09.014",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "36--42",
journal = "Marine Pollution Bulletin",
issn = "0025-326X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

How useful are port surveys focused on target pest identification for exotic species management? / Bishop, M. J.; Hutchings, P. A.

In: Marine Pollution Bulletin, Vol. 62, No. 1, 01.2011, p. 36-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - How useful are port surveys focused on target pest identification for exotic species management?

AU - Bishop, M. J.

AU - Hutchings, P. A.

PY - 2011/1

Y1 - 2011/1

N2 - Monitoring surveys are an important tool for detecting new arrivals of exotic species, for documenting patterns of invasion, and exotic species impacts. Faced with time and cost constraints, these surveys are increasingly focused on lists of target pest species, identified as being most likely to arrive and cause significant harm. We used the national survey of Australian international ports for introduced marine pests as a case study to assess: (1) the taxonomic rigor of surveys focused on detection of target species; and (2) how the ability of port surveys to inform invasion patterns is dependent on taxonomic approach. Our analysis of the 46 available reports revealed common sub-optimal taxonomic practices that compromised their utility to identify abiotic conditions that are good predictors of biological invasion. Thus, although surveys for target species may provide information on the distribution of a handful of species, they may fail to do much else.

AB - Monitoring surveys are an important tool for detecting new arrivals of exotic species, for documenting patterns of invasion, and exotic species impacts. Faced with time and cost constraints, these surveys are increasingly focused on lists of target pest species, identified as being most likely to arrive and cause significant harm. We used the national survey of Australian international ports for introduced marine pests as a case study to assess: (1) the taxonomic rigor of surveys focused on detection of target species; and (2) how the ability of port surveys to inform invasion patterns is dependent on taxonomic approach. Our analysis of the 46 available reports revealed common sub-optimal taxonomic practices that compromised their utility to identify abiotic conditions that are good predictors of biological invasion. Thus, although surveys for target species may provide information on the distribution of a handful of species, they may fail to do much else.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78751634805&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.09.014

DO - 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.09.014

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 36

EP - 42

JO - Marine Pollution Bulletin

T2 - Marine Pollution Bulletin

JF - Marine Pollution Bulletin

SN - 0025-326X

IS - 1

ER -