Abstract
WHOIS acts as a registry for organisations or individuals who 'own' or take responsibility for domains. For any registry to be functional, its integrity needs to be assured. Unfortunately, WHOIS data does not appear to meet basic integrity requirements in many cases, reducing the effectiveness of law enforcement and rightsholders in requesting takedowns for phishing kits, zombie hosts that are part of a botnet, or infringing content. In this paper, we illustrate the problem using a case study from trademark protection, where investigators attempt to trace fake goods being advertised on Facebook. The results indicate that ICANN needs to at least introduce minimum verification standards for WHOIS records vis-à-vis integrity, and optimally, develop a system for rapid takedowns in the event that a domain is being misused.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Proceedings - 4th Cybercrime and Trustworthy Computing Workshop, CTC 2013 |
Place of Publication | Piscataway, NJ |
Publisher | Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) |
Pages | 44-49 |
Number of pages | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2014 |
Event | Cybercrime and Trustworthy Computing Workshop (4th : 2013) - Sydney, NSW, Australia Duration: 21 Nov 2013 → 22 Nov 2013 |
Other
Other | Cybercrime and Trustworthy Computing Workshop (4th : 2013) |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | CTC 2013 |
Country/Territory | Australia |
City | Sydney, NSW |
Period | 21/11/13 → 22/11/13 |
Keywords
- ICANN
- WHOIS
- policy
- online advertising
- intellectual property