Identifying clinical study types from PubMed metadata: the active (machine) learning approach

Adam G. Dunn*, Diana Arachi, Florence T. Bourgeois

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalConference paperpeer-review

25 Downloads (Pure)


We examined a process for automating the classification of articles in MEDLINE aimed at minimising manual effort without sacrificing accuracy. From 22,808 articles pertaining to 19 antidepressants, 1000 were randomly selected and manually labelled according to article type (including, randomised controlled trials, editorials, etc.). We applied a machine learning approach termed 'active learning', where the learner (machine) selects the order in which the user (human) labels examples. Via simulation, we determined the number of articles a user needed to label to produce a classifier with at least 95% recall and 90% precision in three scenarios related to evidence synthesis. We found that the active learning process reduced the number of training instances required by 70%, 19%, and 14% in the three scenarios. The results show that the active learning method may be used in some scenarios to produce accurate classifiers that meet the needs of evidence synthesis tasks and reduce manual effort.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)867-871
Number of pages5
JournalStudies in Health Technology and Informatics
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Event15th World Congress on Health and Biomedical Informatics, MEDINFO 2015 - Sao Paulo, Brazil
Duration: 19 Aug 201523 Aug 2015

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Publisher 2015. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.


Dive into the research topics of 'Identifying clinical study types from PubMed metadata: the active (machine) learning approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this