Imagined stimuli: Imaginary effects?

John Predebon; Peter Wenderoth

doi:10.3758/BF03329830

Imagined stimuli: Imaginary effects?

John Predebon^*, Peter Wenderoth

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Wallace (1984) reported the results of three experiments that apparently indicated a functional equivalence between imagery-induced and physically induced visual illusions. We argue that his findings can be plausibly explained in terms of demand characteristics present in the experimental situation.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	215-216
Number of pages	2
Journal	Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society
Volume	23
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03329830
Publication status	Published - 1985

Access to Document

10.3758/BF03329830

Cite this

@article{cbf75ebd8c3b408491cdb39953fd3dd2,

title = "Imagined stimuli: Imaginary effects?",

abstract = "Wallace (1984) reported the results of three experiments that apparently indicated a functional equivalence between imagery-induced and physically induced visual illusions. We argue that his findings can be plausibly explained in terms of demand characteristics present in the experimental situation.",

author = "John Predebon and Peter Wenderoth",

year = "1985",

doi = "10.3758/BF03329830",

language = "English",

volume = "23",

pages = "215--216",

journal = "Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society",

issn = "0090-5054",

publisher = "Psychonomic Society Inc.",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Imagined stimuli

T2 - Imaginary effects?

AU - Predebon, John

AU - Wenderoth, Peter

PY - 1985

Y1 - 1985

N2 - Wallace (1984) reported the results of three experiments that apparently indicated a functional equivalence between imagery-induced and physically induced visual illusions. We argue that his findings can be plausibly explained in terms of demand characteristics present in the experimental situation.

AB - Wallace (1984) reported the results of three experiments that apparently indicated a functional equivalence between imagery-induced and physically induced visual illusions. We argue that his findings can be plausibly explained in terms of demand characteristics present in the experimental situation.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0038346193

U2 - 10.3758/BF03329830

DO - 10.3758/BF03329830

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0038346193

SN - 0090-5054

VL - 23

SP - 215

EP - 216

JO - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society

JF - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society

IS - 3

ER -

Imagined stimuli: Imaginary effects?

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this