TY - CHAP
T1 - Imaging the lithosphere and upper mantle
T2 - where we are at and where we are going
AU - Afonso, Juan Carlos
AU - Moorkamp, Max
AU - Fullea, Javier
PY - 2016/4/1
Y1 - 2016/4/1
N2 - Hypotheses and conclusions concerning the physical state of the interior of the Earth are under constant debate. At least part of the controversy lies in the fact that traditionally studies of different nature (i.e., seismic, geochemical, electromagnetic, etc.), with very different spatial and temporal resolutions and sensitivities to the thermochemical structure of the Earth’s interior, have been used in isolation to explain the same phenomena (e.g., temperature or velocity anomalies, magmatism, plate motion, strain partitioning, etc.). There is no a priori reason, however, why the results from these diverse studies should be strictly comparable, consistent, or compatible, despite sampling the same physical structure. In recent years, however, advances on computational power, inversion methods, and laboratory experimental techniques, as well as the dramatic increase on both quality and quantity of multiple geophysical and geochemical datasets, have created great interest on integrated (joint) multidisciplinary analyses capable of exploiting the complementary benefits of different datasets/methods. This chapter endeavors to provide a comprehensive review of the current state of the art in such integrated studies of the lithosphere and sublithospheric upper mantle, as well as of their benefits and limitations. Although important stand‐alone (single‐data) methods are briefly discussed, the emphasis is on forward, inverse, and probabilistic techniques that integrate two or more datasets into a formal joint analysis. The role of emerging trends for imaging the Earth’s interior and their potential for elucidating the physical state of the planet are also discussed.
AB - Hypotheses and conclusions concerning the physical state of the interior of the Earth are under constant debate. At least part of the controversy lies in the fact that traditionally studies of different nature (i.e., seismic, geochemical, electromagnetic, etc.), with very different spatial and temporal resolutions and sensitivities to the thermochemical structure of the Earth’s interior, have been used in isolation to explain the same phenomena (e.g., temperature or velocity anomalies, magmatism, plate motion, strain partitioning, etc.). There is no a priori reason, however, why the results from these diverse studies should be strictly comparable, consistent, or compatible, despite sampling the same physical structure. In recent years, however, advances on computational power, inversion methods, and laboratory experimental techniques, as well as the dramatic increase on both quality and quantity of multiple geophysical and geochemical datasets, have created great interest on integrated (joint) multidisciplinary analyses capable of exploiting the complementary benefits of different datasets/methods. This chapter endeavors to provide a comprehensive review of the current state of the art in such integrated studies of the lithosphere and sublithospheric upper mantle, as well as of their benefits and limitations. Although important stand‐alone (single‐data) methods are briefly discussed, the emphasis is on forward, inverse, and probabilistic techniques that integrate two or more datasets into a formal joint analysis. The role of emerging trends for imaging the Earth’s interior and their potential for elucidating the physical state of the planet are also discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014332738&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP120102372
U2 - 10.1002/9781118929063.ch10
DO - 10.1002/9781118929063.ch10
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:85014332738
SN - 9781118929056
T3 - Geophysical monograph
SP - 191
EP - 218
BT - Integrated imaging of the earth
A2 - Moorkamp, Max
A2 - Lelièvre, Peter G.
A2 - Linde, Niklas
A2 - Khan, Amir
PB - John Wiley & Sons
CY - Hoboken, N. J.
ER -