Imperatives, phantom pains, and hallucination by presupposition

Colin Klein*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Several authors have recently argued that the content of pains (and bodily sensations more generally) is imperative rather than descriptive. I show that such an account can help resolve competing intuitions about phantom limb pain. As imperatives, phantom pains are neither true nor false. However, phantom limb pains presuppose falsehoods, in the same way that any imperative which demands something impossible presupposes a falsehood. Phantom pains, like many chronic pains, are thus commands that cannot be satisfied. I conclude by showing that some of the negative psychological consequences of chronic pain are a direct consequence of their imperative nature.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)917-928
Number of pages12
JournalPhilosophical Psychology
Volume25
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Imperatives
  • Intentionalism
  • Pain
  • Phantom Limbs

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Imperatives, phantom pains, and hallucination by presupposition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this