Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Implementation of low-intensity thrombolysis monitoring care in routine practice: Process Evaluation of the Optimal Post rtPA-IV Monitoring in Acute Ischemic Stroke Study in the USA

  • Menglu Ouyang
  • , Francisca González
  • , Michelle Montalbano
  • , April Pruski
  • , Stephen Jan
  • , Xia Wang
  • , Brenda Johnson
  • , Debbie V. Summers
  • , Pooja Khatri
  • , Alejandra Malavera
  • , Michael Iacobelli
  • , Roland Faigle
  • , Paula Munoz-Venturelli
  • , Francisca Urrutia Goldsack
  • , Diana Day
  • , Thompson G. Robinson
  • , Alice C. Durham
  • , Ahtasam Ebraimo
  • , Lili Song
  • , Yi Sui
  • Wan Asyraf Wan Zaidi, Richard I. Lindley, Candice Delcourt, Victor Cruz Urrutia, Craig S. Anderson, Hueiming Liu

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Introduction: The ongoing OPTIMISTmain study, an international, multicenter, stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial, aims to determine effectiveness and safety of lowintensity versus standard monitoring in thrombolysistreated patients with mild-to-moderate acute ischemic stroke (AIS). An embedded process evaluation explored integration and impact of the intervention on care processes at participating US sites. Methods: A mixed-methods approach with quantitative and qualitative data was collected between September 2021 and November 2022. Implementer surveys were undertaken at pre- and postintervention phases to understand the perceptions of low-intensity monitoring strategy. A sample of stroke care nurses were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews at an early stage of post-intervention. Qualitative data were analyzed deductively using the normalization process theory; quantitative data were tabulated. Results: Interviews with 21 nurses at 8 hospitals have shown low-intensity monitoring was well accepted as there were less time constraints and reduced workload for each patient. There were initial safety concerns over missing deteriorating patients and difficulties in changing established routines. Proper training, education, and communication, and changing the habits and culture of care, were key elements to successfully adopting the new monitoring care into routine practice. Similar results were found in the postintervention survey (42 nurses from 13 hospitals). Nurses reported time being freed up to provide patient education (56%), daily living care (50%), early mobilization (26%), mood/cognition assessment (44%), and other aspects (i.e., communication, family support). Conclusions: Lowintensity monitoring for patients with mild-to-moderate AIS, facilitated by appropriate education and organizational support, appears feasible and acceptable at US hospitals.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)96-104
Number of pages9
JournalCerebrovascular Diseases
Volume54
Issue number1
Early online date5 Mar 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2025

Keywords

  • Implementation
  • Ischemic stroke
  • Low-intensity monitoring
  • Process evaluation
  • Thrombolysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Implementation of low-intensity thrombolysis monitoring care in routine practice: Process Evaluation of the Optimal Post rtPA-IV Monitoring in Acute Ischemic Stroke Study in the USA'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this