Implementation of symptom protocols for nurses providing telephone-based cancer symptom management

A Comparative Case Study

Dawn Stacey*, Esther Green, Barbara Ballantyne, Joy Tarasuk, Myriam Skrutkowski, Meg Carley, Kim Chapman, Craig Kuziemsky, Erin Kolari, Brenda Sabo, Andréanne Saucier, Tara Shaw, Lucie Tardif, Tracy Truant, Greta G. Cummings, Doris Howell

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The pan-Canadian Oncology Symptom Triage and Remote Support (COSTaRS) team developed 13 evidence-informed protocols for symptom management. 

Aim: To build an effective and sustainable approach for implementing the COSTaRS protocols for nurses providing telephone-based symptom support to cancer patients. Methods: A comparative case study was guided by the Knowledge to Action Framework. Three cases were created for three Canadian oncology programs that have nurses providing telephone support. Teams of researchers and knowledge users: (a) assessed barriers and facilitators influencing protocol use, (b) adapted protocols for local use, (c) intervened to address barriers, (d) monitored use, and (e) assessed barriers and facilitators influencing sustained use. Analysis was within and across cases. 

Results: At baseline, >85% nurses rated protocols positively but barriers were identified (64-80% needed training). Patients and families identified similar barriers and thought protocols would enhance consistency among nurses teaching self-management. Twenty-two COSTaRS workshops reached 85% to 97% of targeted nurses (N = 119). Nurses felt more confident with symptom management and using the COSTaRS protocols (p <.01). Protocol adaptations addressed barriers (e.g., health records approval, creating pocket versions, distributing with telephone messages). Chart audits revealed that protocols used were documented for 11% to 47% of patient calls. Sustained use requires organizational alignment and ongoing leadership support. 

Linking Evidence to Action: Protocol uptake was similar to trials that have evaluated tailored interventions to improve professional practice by overcoming identified barriers. Collaborating with knowledge users facilitated interpretation of findings, aided protocol adaptation, and supported implementation. Protocol implementation in nursing requires a tailored approach. A multifaceted intervention approach increased nurses’ use of evidence-informed protocols during telephone calls with patients about symptoms. Training and other interventions improved nurses’ confidence with using COSTaRS protocols and their uptake was evident in some documented telephone calls. Protocols could be adapted for use by patients and nurses globally.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)420-431
Number of pages12
JournalWorldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing
Volume13
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2016
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2016. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • cancer
  • case study
  • implementation
  • knowledge to action
  • knowledge translation tools
  • nursing
  • symptom management

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Implementation of symptom protocols for nurses providing telephone-based cancer symptom management: A Comparative Case Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this