Implementing large-system value-based healthcare initiatives

a realist study protocol for seven natural experiments

Mitchell Sarkies*, Emilie Francis-Auton, Janet C. Long, Andrew Partington, Chiara Pomare, Hoa Mi Nguyen, Wendy Wu, Johanna Westbrook, Richard O. Day, Jean-Frédéric Levesque, Rebecca Mitchell, Frances Rapport, Henry Cutler, Yvonne Tran, Robyn Clay-Williams, Diane E. Watson, Gaston Arnolda, Peter D. Hibbert, Reidar Lystad, Virginia Mumford & 4 others George Leipnik, Kim Sutherland, Rebecca Hardwick, Jeffrey Braithwaite

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction Value-based healthcare delivery models have emerged to address the unprecedented pressure on long-term health system performance and sustainability and to respond to the changing needs and expectations of patients. Implementing and scaling the benefits from these care delivery models to achieve large-system transformation are challenging and require consideration of complexity and context. Realist studies enable researchers to explore factors beyond € what works' towards more nuanced understanding of € what tends to work for whom under which circumstances'. This research proposes a realist study of the implementation approach for seven large-system, value-based healthcare initiatives in New South Wales, Australia, to elucidate how different implementation strategies and processes stimulate the uptake, adoption, fidelity and adherence of initiatives to achieve sustainable impacts across a variety of contexts. Methods and analysis This exploratory, sequential, mixed methods realist study followed RAMESES II (Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards) reporting standards for realist studies. Stage 1 will formulate initial programme theories from review of existing literature, analysis of programme documents and qualitative interviews with programme designers, implementation support staff and evaluators. Stage 2 envisages testing and refining these hypothesised programme theories through qualitative interviews with local hospital network staff running initiatives, and analyses of quantitative data from the programme evaluation, hospital administrative systems and an implementation outcome survey. Stage 3 proposes to produce generalisable middle-range theories by synthesising data from context-mechanism-outcome configurations across initiatives. Qualitative data will be analysed retroductively and quantitative data will be analysed to identify relationships between the implementation strategies and processes, and implementation and programme outcomes. Mixed methods triangulation will be performed. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval has been granted by Macquarie University (Project ID 23816) and Hunter New England (Project ID 2020/ETH02186) Human Research Ethics Committees. The findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals. Results will be fed back to partner organisations and roundtable discussions with other health jurisdictions will be held, to share learnings.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere044049
Pages (from-to)1-11
Number of pages11
JournalBMJ Open
Volume10
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Dec 2020

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2020. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • bone diseases
  • diabetic foot
  • end stage renal failure
  • general diabetes
  • health services administration & management
  • heart failure

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Implementing large-system value-based healthcare initiatives: a realist study protocol for seven natural experiments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this