Improving corporate political donations disclosure: lessons from Australia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

One of the activities corporations should be accountable for is their level of political donations. This paper examines two mandatory corporate political donation disclosure regimes in Australia and identifies three important lessons. First, our review confirms that although few citizens may care enough to scrutinise donation disclosure, there are people interested in such information and we should take political donation disclosure regimes seriously. Second, a well-funded entity must be made responsible not just for administering the disclosure system, but also for reviewing and recommending updates to the system. One disclosure regime examined in this paper was never updated to reflect the existence of the internet until 2007, because no-one was responsible for monitoring the regime and suggesting necessary updates. Finally, details concerning the ultimate source of donations should be provided.

LanguageEnglish
Pages190-202
Number of pages13
JournalSocial and Environmental Accountability Journal
Volume37
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Sep 2017

Fingerprint

Disclosure
Donation
World Wide Web
Reviewing
Monitoring

Cite this

@article{d55b4554016e4d0b926cdf58e9c6931a,
title = "Improving corporate political donations disclosure: lessons from Australia",
abstract = "One of the activities corporations should be accountable for is their level of political donations. This paper examines two mandatory corporate political donation disclosure regimes in Australia and identifies three important lessons. First, our review confirms that although few citizens may care enough to scrutinise donation disclosure, there are people interested in such information and we should take political donation disclosure regimes seriously. Second, a well-funded entity must be made responsible not just for administering the disclosure system, but also for reviewing and recommending updates to the system. One disclosure regime examined in this paper was never updated to reflect the existence of the internet until 2007, because no-one was responsible for monitoring the regime and suggesting necessary updates. Finally, details concerning the ultimate source of donations should be provided.",
author = "Shane Leong and James Hazelton",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/0969160X.2017.1336108",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "190--202",
journal = "Social and Environmental Accountability Journal",
issn = "0969-160X",
publisher = "Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group",
number = "3",

}

Improving corporate political donations disclosure : lessons from Australia. / Leong, Shane; Hazelton, James.

In: Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, Vol. 37, No. 3, 02.09.2017, p. 190-202.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving corporate political donations disclosure

T2 - Social and Environmental Accountability Journal

AU - Leong, Shane

AU - Hazelton, James

PY - 2017/9/2

Y1 - 2017/9/2

N2 - One of the activities corporations should be accountable for is their level of political donations. This paper examines two mandatory corporate political donation disclosure regimes in Australia and identifies three important lessons. First, our review confirms that although few citizens may care enough to scrutinise donation disclosure, there are people interested in such information and we should take political donation disclosure regimes seriously. Second, a well-funded entity must be made responsible not just for administering the disclosure system, but also for reviewing and recommending updates to the system. One disclosure regime examined in this paper was never updated to reflect the existence of the internet until 2007, because no-one was responsible for monitoring the regime and suggesting necessary updates. Finally, details concerning the ultimate source of donations should be provided.

AB - One of the activities corporations should be accountable for is their level of political donations. This paper examines two mandatory corporate political donation disclosure regimes in Australia and identifies three important lessons. First, our review confirms that although few citizens may care enough to scrutinise donation disclosure, there are people interested in such information and we should take political donation disclosure regimes seriously. Second, a well-funded entity must be made responsible not just for administering the disclosure system, but also for reviewing and recommending updates to the system. One disclosure regime examined in this paper was never updated to reflect the existence of the internet until 2007, because no-one was responsible for monitoring the regime and suggesting necessary updates. Finally, details concerning the ultimate source of donations should be provided.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020177080&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0969160X.2017.1336108

DO - 10.1080/0969160X.2017.1336108

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 190

EP - 202

JO - Social and Environmental Accountability Journal

JF - Social and Environmental Accountability Journal

SN - 0969-160X

IS - 3

ER -