Improving faithfulness and factuality with contrastive learning in explainable recommendation

Recommender systems have become increasingly important in navigating the vast amount of information and options available in various domains. By tailoring and personalizing recommendations to user preferences and interests, these systems improve the user experience, efficiency, and satisfaction. With a growing demand for transparency and understanding of recommendation outputs, explainable recommender systems have gained growing attention in recent years. Additionally, as user reviews could be considered the rationales behind why the user likes (or dislikes) the products, generating informative and reliable reviews alongside recommendations has thus emerged as a research focus in explainable recommendation. However, the model-generated reviews might contain factually inconsistent contents (i.e., the hallucination issue), which would thus compromise the recommendation rationales. To address this issue, we propose a contrastive learning framework to improve the faithfulness and factuality in explainable recommendation in this article. We further develop different strategies of generating positive and negative examples for contrastive learning, such as back-translation or synonym substitution for positive examples, and editing positive examples or utilizing model-generated texts for negative examples. Our proposed method optimizes the model to distinguish faithful explanations (i.e., positive examples) and unfaithful ones with factual errors (i.e., negative examples), which thus drives the model to generate faithful reviews as explanations while avoiding inconsistent contents. Extensive experiments and analysis on three benchmark datasets show that our proposed model outperforms other review generation baselines in faithfulness and factuality. In addition, the proposed contrastive learning component could be easily incorporated into other explainable recommender systems in a plug-and-play manner.