In trust we trust: epistemic vigilance and responsibility

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)
36 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Much of what we know we know through testimony, and knowing on the basis of testimony requires some degree of trust in speakers. Trust is therefore very valuable. But in trusting, we expose ourselves to risks of harm and betrayal. It is therefore important to trust well. In this paper, I discuss two recent cases of the betrayal of trust in (broadly) academic contexts: one involving hoax submissions to journals, the other faking an identity on social media. I consider whether these betrayals suggest that we ought to be less trusting in contexts like these. I argue that we should not: the acquisition of knowledge is dependent on trust, and we cannot intentionally reduce the extent to which we trust in these kinds of contexts without risking destroying it utterly. Instead, we must trust in our epistemic networks and the way they work to filter out deception.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)283-298
Number of pages16
JournalSocial Epistemology
Volume36
Issue number3
Early online date28 Feb 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2022. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • trust
  • epistemic injustice
  • testimony

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'In trust we trust: epistemic vigilance and responsibility'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this