Incorporating future climate uncertainty into the identification of climate change refugia for threatened species

Linda J. Beaumont, Manuel Esperón-Rodríguez, David A. Nipperess, Mareshell Wauchope-Drumm, John B. Baumgartner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Climate change presents a substantial threat to species unable to keep pace via migration or adaptation. In-situ climate refugia, areas currently occupied by a species and that remain suitable in the future, will be vital for species with dispersal limitations. Ex-situ refugia, areas beyond species' current ranges that remain suitable, may facilitate range shifts or provide options for translocation. Assessing both refugia is a conservation priority. Here, we identify refugia for 319 species threatened in New South Wales, using four plausible scenarios describing futures that are Warmer/Wetter, Warmer/Drier, Hotter/Wetter and Hotter/Little Precipitation change, relative to the present. Using Maxent, we identify (a) in-situ refugia for each species under each scenario; (b) regions of consensus – areas projected as in-situ refugia across all scenarios; (c) hotspots of in-situ refugia (regions suitable for >1 species); and (d) regions of consensus for ex-situ refugia. Species were categorised based on the extent of in- and ex-situ refugia. By 2070, refugia will likely be broadest, and narrowest, under the Warmer/Wetter and Hotter/Wetter scenarios, respectively. East coast regions currently suitable for multiple species are unlikely to remain as hotspots. Most species (65%) are projected to have limited regions of consensus for either refugia. Translocation should be explored for species with little-to-no in-situ refugia, but for which ex-situ refugia exist. Management of existing populations will be critical for species with in-situ refugia but limited ex-situ. We highlight how management decisions based on agreement across climate scenarios can be made, irrespective of uncertainty about the magnitude of climate change.

LanguageEnglish
Pages230-237
Number of pages8
JournalBiological Conservation
Volume237
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2019

Fingerprint

refugium
threatened species
refuge habitats
uncertainty
climate change
climate
translocation
in situ
New South Wales

Keywords

  • climate change
  • climate change refugia
  • habitat suitability models
  • Maxent
  • Saving our Species
  • translocation
  • vulnerability

Cite this

@article{caeedb98ba004204b8e8dfe0a35a70eb,
title = "Incorporating future climate uncertainty into the identification of climate change refugia for threatened species",
abstract = "Climate change presents a substantial threat to species unable to keep pace via migration or adaptation. In-situ climate refugia, areas currently occupied by a species and that remain suitable in the future, will be vital for species with dispersal limitations. Ex-situ refugia, areas beyond species' current ranges that remain suitable, may facilitate range shifts or provide options for translocation. Assessing both refugia is a conservation priority. Here, we identify refugia for 319 species threatened in New South Wales, using four plausible scenarios describing futures that are Warmer/Wetter, Warmer/Drier, Hotter/Wetter and Hotter/Little Precipitation change, relative to the present. Using Maxent, we identify (a) in-situ refugia for each species under each scenario; (b) regions of consensus – areas projected as in-situ refugia across all scenarios; (c) hotspots of in-situ refugia (regions suitable for >1 species); and (d) regions of consensus for ex-situ refugia. Species were categorised based on the extent of in- and ex-situ refugia. By 2070, refugia will likely be broadest, and narrowest, under the Warmer/Wetter and Hotter/Wetter scenarios, respectively. East coast regions currently suitable for multiple species are unlikely to remain as hotspots. Most species (65{\%}) are projected to have limited regions of consensus for either refugia. Translocation should be explored for species with little-to-no in-situ refugia, but for which ex-situ refugia exist. Management of existing populations will be critical for species with in-situ refugia but limited ex-situ. We highlight how management decisions based on agreement across climate scenarios can be made, irrespective of uncertainty about the magnitude of climate change.",
keywords = "climate change, climate change refugia, habitat suitability models, Maxent, Saving our Species, translocation, vulnerability",
author = "Beaumont, {Linda J.} and Manuel Esper{\'o}n-Rodr{\'i}guez and Nipperess, {David A.} and Mareshell Wauchope-Drumm and Baumgartner, {John B.}",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.biocon.2019.07.013",
language = "English",
volume = "237",
pages = "230--237",
journal = "Biological Conservation",
issn = "0006-3207",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Incorporating future climate uncertainty into the identification of climate change refugia for threatened species. / Beaumont, Linda J.; Esperón-Rodríguez, Manuel; Nipperess, David A.; Wauchope-Drumm, Mareshell; Baumgartner, John B.

In: Biological Conservation, Vol. 237, 09.2019, p. 230-237.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Incorporating future climate uncertainty into the identification of climate change refugia for threatened species

AU - Beaumont, Linda J.

AU - Esperón-Rodríguez, Manuel

AU - Nipperess, David A.

AU - Wauchope-Drumm, Mareshell

AU - Baumgartner, John B.

PY - 2019/9

Y1 - 2019/9

N2 - Climate change presents a substantial threat to species unable to keep pace via migration or adaptation. In-situ climate refugia, areas currently occupied by a species and that remain suitable in the future, will be vital for species with dispersal limitations. Ex-situ refugia, areas beyond species' current ranges that remain suitable, may facilitate range shifts or provide options for translocation. Assessing both refugia is a conservation priority. Here, we identify refugia for 319 species threatened in New South Wales, using four plausible scenarios describing futures that are Warmer/Wetter, Warmer/Drier, Hotter/Wetter and Hotter/Little Precipitation change, relative to the present. Using Maxent, we identify (a) in-situ refugia for each species under each scenario; (b) regions of consensus – areas projected as in-situ refugia across all scenarios; (c) hotspots of in-situ refugia (regions suitable for >1 species); and (d) regions of consensus for ex-situ refugia. Species were categorised based on the extent of in- and ex-situ refugia. By 2070, refugia will likely be broadest, and narrowest, under the Warmer/Wetter and Hotter/Wetter scenarios, respectively. East coast regions currently suitable for multiple species are unlikely to remain as hotspots. Most species (65%) are projected to have limited regions of consensus for either refugia. Translocation should be explored for species with little-to-no in-situ refugia, but for which ex-situ refugia exist. Management of existing populations will be critical for species with in-situ refugia but limited ex-situ. We highlight how management decisions based on agreement across climate scenarios can be made, irrespective of uncertainty about the magnitude of climate change.

AB - Climate change presents a substantial threat to species unable to keep pace via migration or adaptation. In-situ climate refugia, areas currently occupied by a species and that remain suitable in the future, will be vital for species with dispersal limitations. Ex-situ refugia, areas beyond species' current ranges that remain suitable, may facilitate range shifts or provide options for translocation. Assessing both refugia is a conservation priority. Here, we identify refugia for 319 species threatened in New South Wales, using four plausible scenarios describing futures that are Warmer/Wetter, Warmer/Drier, Hotter/Wetter and Hotter/Little Precipitation change, relative to the present. Using Maxent, we identify (a) in-situ refugia for each species under each scenario; (b) regions of consensus – areas projected as in-situ refugia across all scenarios; (c) hotspots of in-situ refugia (regions suitable for >1 species); and (d) regions of consensus for ex-situ refugia. Species were categorised based on the extent of in- and ex-situ refugia. By 2070, refugia will likely be broadest, and narrowest, under the Warmer/Wetter and Hotter/Wetter scenarios, respectively. East coast regions currently suitable for multiple species are unlikely to remain as hotspots. Most species (65%) are projected to have limited regions of consensus for either refugia. Translocation should be explored for species with little-to-no in-situ refugia, but for which ex-situ refugia exist. Management of existing populations will be critical for species with in-situ refugia but limited ex-situ. We highlight how management decisions based on agreement across climate scenarios can be made, irrespective of uncertainty about the magnitude of climate change.

KW - climate change

KW - climate change refugia

KW - habitat suitability models

KW - Maxent

KW - Saving our Species

KW - translocation

KW - vulnerability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068790562&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.07.013

DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.07.013

M3 - Article

VL - 237

SP - 230

EP - 237

JO - Biological Conservation

T2 - Biological Conservation

JF - Biological Conservation

SN - 0006-3207

ER -