Increases in fluxes of greenhouse gases and methyl mercury following flooding of an experimental reservoir

C. A. Kelly*, J. W M Rudd, R. A. Bodaly, N. P. Roulet, V. L. St.Louis, A. Heyes, T. R. Moore, S. Schiff, R. Aravena, K. J. Scott, B. Dyck, R. Harris, B. Warner, G. Edwards

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

290 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Experimental flooding of a boreal forest wetland caused the wetland to change from being a small, natural carbon sink, with respect to the atmosphere, of -6.6 g of C m-2 yr-1 to o large source of +130 g of C m- 2 yr-1. This change was caused by the death of the vegetation, which eliminated the photosynthetic CO2 sink and stimulated the microbial production of CO2 and CH4 from decomposition of plant tissues and peat. Another type of microbial activity that increased was the methylation of inorganic mercury to the much more toxic methyl mercury (MeHg) form. The wetland was a source of MeHg prior to flooding and became an even larger source (39 fold) after flooding. MeHg concentrations in the water sometimes exceeded 2 ng L-1, with the average being 0.9 ng L-1 in the first 2 years after flooding. MeHg also increased in the flooded vegetation and peat, in lower food chain organisms, and in fish. Two recommendations, which should minimize both greenhouse gas production and MeHg production in reservoirs, can be made: (1) minimize the total area of land flooded (i.e., avoid flooding areas of low relief) and (2) minimize the flooding of wetlands, which contain larger quantities of organic carbon than uplands and are sites of intense production of MeHg.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1334-1344
Number of pages11
JournalEnvironmental Science and Technology
Volume31
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Increases in fluxes of greenhouse gases and methyl mercury following flooding of an experimental reservoir'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this