Abstract
The present study examined whether explicit training of letter-clusters leads to more gains in word-reading speed than training of the separate letters of the same clusters. Ninety-nine poor reading second-grade children were randomly assigned to a cluster-training, a parallel letter-training, or a no-training condition. The clustertraining condition showed superior short-term and long-term improvement on rapid naming of trained and untrained letter clusters, whereas the letter-training condition showed superior short-term improvement on rapid naming of trained letters. In addition, compared with the no-training condition, the cluster and letter training showed the same superior short-term and long-term improvement on trained words and pseudowords. However, both training conditions showed only marginally more short-term improvement for untrained pseudowords and only marginally more longterm improvement on a word reading-fluency task. Apparently, improvement of rapid naming of letter clusters does not, or barely, result in improvement of untrained words and pseudowords.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 166-185 |
| Number of pages | 20 |
| Journal | Scientific Studies of Reading |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2012 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Increasing word-reading speed in poor readers: No additional benefits of explicit letter-cluster training'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver