Abstract
We defend the view that an indexical uttered by an actor works on the model of deferred reference. If it defers to a character which does not exist, it is an empty term, just as 'Hamlet' and 'Ophelia' Me. The utterance in which it appears does not express a proposition and thus lacks a truth value. We advocate an ontologically parsimonious, anti-realist, position. We show how the notion of truth in our use and understanding of indexicals (and fictional names) as they appear within a fiction is not a central issue. We claim that our use and understanding of indexicals (and names) rests on the fact that their cognitive contribution is not exhausted by their semantic contribution.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 121-136 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Dialectica |
Volume | 57 |
Issue number | 2 |
Publication status | Published - 2003 |