Individualising care. the transformation of personal support in old age

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This paper considers developments in long-term care that are increasingly focused around the individual. Recent decades have seen massive changes in the way that care is understood and provided. Yet in Australia, as in Europe, North America and Asia, we are still a long way from a stable state of agreed services and provisions. Emphasising the social theory behind the shift, it is argued that understanding the individualisation of care cannot be reduced to a simple dichotomy of good or bad. Individualised care promises much, but the concept is applied to a wide range of phenomena, often in ways that conceal rather than reveal the character of the transactions involved. For individualisation to become meaningful it must be developed as a condition of recognition that is equally applicable to those who provide and those who depend on care. It is also important to distinguish individualised care finance arrangements from real attainments in the practice of providing care. These distinctions are necessary if we are to distinguish its use as an ideological justification for welfare cutbacks and the restructuring of care provisions as markets from the liberating potential that the approach can present when care practices are more truly based around the recognition of the individuals concerned: those who receive and depend on assistance as well as those who provide it.

LanguageEnglish
Pages421-436
Number of pages16
JournalAgeing and Society
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Northern Asia
Long-Term Care
North America
old age
individualization
Social Theory
Old Age
transaction
restructuring
finance
assistance
welfare

Cite this

@article{b5a08af9de7445a2b617d8c4c2f3995a,
title = "Individualising care. the transformation of personal support in old age",
abstract = "This paper considers developments in long-term care that are increasingly focused around the individual. Recent decades have seen massive changes in the way that care is understood and provided. Yet in Australia, as in Europe, North America and Asia, we are still a long way from a stable state of agreed services and provisions. Emphasising the social theory behind the shift, it is argued that understanding the individualisation of care cannot be reduced to a simple dichotomy of good or bad. Individualised care promises much, but the concept is applied to a wide range of phenomena, often in ways that conceal rather than reveal the character of the transactions involved. For individualisation to become meaningful it must be developed as a condition of recognition that is equally applicable to those who provide and those who depend on care. It is also important to distinguish individualised care finance arrangements from real attainments in the practice of providing care. These distinctions are necessary if we are to distinguish its use as an ideological justification for welfare cutbacks and the restructuring of care provisions as markets from the liberating potential that the approach can present when care practices are more truly based around the recognition of the individuals concerned: those who receive and depend on assistance as well as those who provide it.",
author = "Fine, {Michael D.}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1017/S0144686X11001310",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "421--436",
journal = "Ageing and Society",
issn = "0144-686X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

Individualising care. the transformation of personal support in old age. / Fine, Michael D.

In: Ageing and Society, Vol. 33, No. 3, 2013, p. 421-436.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individualising care. the transformation of personal support in old age

AU - Fine, Michael D.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This paper considers developments in long-term care that are increasingly focused around the individual. Recent decades have seen massive changes in the way that care is understood and provided. Yet in Australia, as in Europe, North America and Asia, we are still a long way from a stable state of agreed services and provisions. Emphasising the social theory behind the shift, it is argued that understanding the individualisation of care cannot be reduced to a simple dichotomy of good or bad. Individualised care promises much, but the concept is applied to a wide range of phenomena, often in ways that conceal rather than reveal the character of the transactions involved. For individualisation to become meaningful it must be developed as a condition of recognition that is equally applicable to those who provide and those who depend on care. It is also important to distinguish individualised care finance arrangements from real attainments in the practice of providing care. These distinctions are necessary if we are to distinguish its use as an ideological justification for welfare cutbacks and the restructuring of care provisions as markets from the liberating potential that the approach can present when care practices are more truly based around the recognition of the individuals concerned: those who receive and depend on assistance as well as those who provide it.

AB - This paper considers developments in long-term care that are increasingly focused around the individual. Recent decades have seen massive changes in the way that care is understood and provided. Yet in Australia, as in Europe, North America and Asia, we are still a long way from a stable state of agreed services and provisions. Emphasising the social theory behind the shift, it is argued that understanding the individualisation of care cannot be reduced to a simple dichotomy of good or bad. Individualised care promises much, but the concept is applied to a wide range of phenomena, often in ways that conceal rather than reveal the character of the transactions involved. For individualisation to become meaningful it must be developed as a condition of recognition that is equally applicable to those who provide and those who depend on care. It is also important to distinguish individualised care finance arrangements from real attainments in the practice of providing care. These distinctions are necessary if we are to distinguish its use as an ideological justification for welfare cutbacks and the restructuring of care provisions as markets from the liberating potential that the approach can present when care practices are more truly based around the recognition of the individuals concerned: those who receive and depend on assistance as well as those who provide it.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876902896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0144686X11001310

DO - 10.1017/S0144686X11001310

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 421

EP - 436

JO - Ageing and Society

T2 - Ageing and Society

JF - Ageing and Society

SN - 0144-686X

IS - 3

ER -