Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Individualistic culture and firm default risk: Cross-country evidence

  • Sivathaasan Nadarajah
  • , Benjamin Liu
  • , Muhammad Atif*
  • , Grant Richardson
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

72 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study examines the association between individualistic culture and firm default risk across countries. Using a sample of 15,225 firms across 32 countries over the 2005–2018 period (115,464 firm-year observations), we find that firms based in countries with high levels of individualism are associated with greater default risk. Our results are robust to a battery of endogeneity and other robustness checks. In additional analyses, we show that risk-taking behavior is a channel through which individualism impacts firm default risk. We also find that the effect of individualistic culture on firm default risk is weak in countries with stringent bankruptcy laws. Overall, the findings of this study can improve our understanding of the impact of major informal institutions, such as individualistic culture, on manager behavior, which has significant implications for firms operating in global financial markets.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)166-194
Number of pages29
JournalInternational Review of Finance
Volume24
Issue number2
Early online date20 Dec 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2024

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. International Review of Finance published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of International Review of Finance Ltd. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • bankruptcy laws
  • default risk
  • individualism
  • national culture
  • risk-taking

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Individualistic culture and firm default risk: Cross-country evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this