Influence of storage relative humidity on the dispersion of salmeterol xinafoate powders for inhalation

Shyamal Das, Ian Larson, Paul Young, Peter Stewart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The in vitro dispersion of salmeterol xinafoate (SX) alone and four SX (2.5%)–coarse lactose (CL) mixtures containing 0%, 5%, 10% and 20% micronised lactose (ML) was monitored during 18-month storage at 33%, 55% and 75% relative humidity (RH) using a twin stage impinger. The surface moisture was monitored over 2 months by thermo gravimetric analysis. The morphology was determined by scanning electron microscopy. An aerosizer was used to compare the agglomerate strengths of formulations before and after storage at 75% RH. Upon storage, no significant difference occurred in fine particle fraction (FPF) of any formulation at 33% and 55% RH. Within 8 weeks, the FPF of mixture containing 20% ML (M20F) significantly decreased from 11.3% to 7.7% at 75% RH (p = 0.008) and to 4.9% at 95% RH (p = 0.001). The calculated capillary forces were greater for ML–ML contact than other particle interactions and the propensity of ML–ML contacts was higher in M20F. The agglomerate strength of M20F significantly increased after storage. The study concluded that the critical factors for decreased dispersion of SX formulations were RH of 75% or greater and the presence of high concentrations of ML due to capillary forces and/or solid bridge formation of ML leading to increased agglomerate strength.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1015-1027
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Volume98
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2009
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • dispersion
  • storage stability
  • salmeterol xinafoate
  • relative humidity
  • dry powder inhaler
  • agglomerate

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Influence of storage relative humidity on the dispersion of salmeterol xinafoate powders for inhalation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this