Informal Institutional Responses to Government Interventions

lessons from Madhupur National Park, Bangladesh

H. M Tuihedur Rahman, Swapan Kumar Sarker*, Gordon M. Hickey, M. Mohasinul Haque, Niamjit Das

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)


Madhupur National Park is renowned for severe resource ownership conflicts between ethnic communities and government authorities in Bangladesh. In this study, we applied the Institutional Analysis and Development framework to identify: (i) past and present informal institutional structures within the ethnic Garo community for land resource management; (ii) the origin of the land ownership dispute; (iii) interaction mechanisms between formal and informal institutions; and (iv) change in land management authority and informal governance structures. We identify that the informal institutions of the traditional community have undergone radical change due to government interventions with implications for the regulation of land use, informal institutional functions, and joint-decision-making. Importantly, the government’s persistent denial of the role of existing informal institutions is widening the gap between government and community actors, and driving land ownership conflicts in a cyclic way with associated natural resource degradation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1175-1189
Number of pages15
JournalEnvironmental Management
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Informal Institutional Responses to Government Interventions: lessons from Madhupur National Park, Bangladesh'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this