Informal networked deliberation: how mass deliberative democracy really works

Ana Tanasoca

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Deliberative democracy started out as an ideal for mass democracy. Lately, however, its large-scale ambitions have mostly been shelved. This article revivifies the ideal of mass deliberative democracy by offering a clear mechanism by which everyone in the community can be included in the same conversation. The trick is to make use of people’s overlapping social communicative networks through which informal deliberative exchanges already occur on an everyday basis. Far from being derailed by threats of polarization, echo chambers, and motivated reasoning, informal networked deliberation can indeed put everyone in touch, directly or indirectly, with everyone else.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)23-54
    Number of pages32
    JournalAnalyse und Kritik
    Volume45
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2023

    Keywords

    • deliberative democracy
    • scaling up
    • social network
    • inclusion
    • polarization
    • social media
    • echo chamber
    • motivated reasoning

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Informal networked deliberation: how mass deliberative democracy really works'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this