Abstract
Purpose: To highlight the lacunae in ICA law and propose draft articles to the reform thereof.
Originality: The analysis of three legal systems, Common, Civil, and Sharia Law for common principles as applied to ICA in Investor-State Arbitrations.
Key literature / theoretical perspective: Comparative Law
Design/methodology/approach: Grounded theory and Comparative law as well as policy analysis.
Findings: A harmonised ICA Law (HICALC) is feasible.
Research limitations/implications: Common ground exists.
Practical and Social implications: Greater trust, increased trade, higher ICA credibility and world peace.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 14-15 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Expo 2010 Higher Degree Research : book of abstracts |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
| Event | Higher Degree Research Expo (6th : 2010) - Sydney Duration: 19 Nov 2010 → 19 Nov 2010 |
Keywords
- international commercial arbitration law
- international investment treaty law
- oil and gas law and policy
- expropriation
- investor-state arbitrations
- economic development in the MENA