Inhibition of return in response to gaze cues: the roles of time-course and fixation cue

Alexandra Frischen, Daniel Smilek, John D. Eastwood, Steven P. Tipper

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    49 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Recent studies have demonstrated that orienting of attention in response to nonpredictive gaze cues arises rapidly and automatically, in a similar fashion to peripheral sudden onset cueing. However, while peripheral cues consistently elicit inhibition of return (IOR) at about 300 ms following cue onset, very little is known about inhibition effects in response to gaze cues. The present experiments systematically examined the conditions under which IOR arises with such cues. Reliable inhibition effects were obtained. Importantly, IOR emerged only at long cue-target intervals and only when a second cue actively triggered attention away from the cued location. This suggests that compared to sudden onset cueing, gaze cueing results in both prolonged facilitation and a delayed onset of inhibition processes. Thus, although both types of cues elicit very similar orienting effects in terms of their basic behavioural outcomes, there are more subtle differences between gaze and peripheral cues with respect to the maintenance and quality of those cueing effects across time.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)881-895
    Number of pages15
    JournalVisual Cognition
    Volume15
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2007

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Inhibition of return in response to gaze cues: the roles of time-course and fixation cue'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this