TY - JOUR
T1 - Initial paclitaxel improves outcome compared with CMFP combination chemotherapy as front-line therapy in untreated metastatic breast cancer
AU - Bishop, James F.
AU - Dewar, Joanna
AU - Toner, Guy C.
AU - Smith, Jennifer
AU - Tattersall, Martin H. N.
AU - Olver, Ian N.
AU - Ackland, Stephen
AU - Kennedy, Ian
AU - Goldstein, David
AU - Gurney, Howard
AU - Walpole, Euan
AU - Levi, John
AU - Stephenson, Jennifer
AU - Canetta, Renzo
PY - 1999/8
Y1 - 1999/8
N2 - Purpose: To determine the place of single-agent paclitaxel compared with nonanthracycline combination chemotherapy as front-line therapy in metastatic breast cancer. Patients and Methods: Patients with previously untreated metastatic breast cancer were randomized to receive either paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) over 3 hours for eight cycles (24 weeks) or standard cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2/d orally on days 1 to 14, methotrexate 40 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8, fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8, and prednisone 40 mg/m2/d orally on days 1 to 14 (CMFP) for six cycles (24 weeks) with epirubicin recommended as second-line therapy. Results: A total of 209 eligible patients were randomized with a median survival duration of 17.3 months for paclitaxel and 13.9 months for CMFP. Multivariate analysis showed that patients who received paclitaxel survived significantly longer than those who received CMFP (P = .025). Paclitaxel produced significantly less severe leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, mucositis, documented infections (all P < .001), nausea or vomiting (P = .003), and fever without documented infection (P = .007), and less hospitalization for febrile neutropenia than did CMFP (P = .001). Alopecia, peripheral neuropathy, and myalgia or arthralgia were more severe with paclitaxel (all P < .0001). Overall, quality of life was similar for both treatments (P ≥ .07). Conclusion: Initial paclitaxel was associated with significantly less myelosuppression and fewer infections, with longer survival and similar quality of life and control of metastatic breast cancer compared with CMFP.
AB - Purpose: To determine the place of single-agent paclitaxel compared with nonanthracycline combination chemotherapy as front-line therapy in metastatic breast cancer. Patients and Methods: Patients with previously untreated metastatic breast cancer were randomized to receive either paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) over 3 hours for eight cycles (24 weeks) or standard cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2/d orally on days 1 to 14, methotrexate 40 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8, fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8, and prednisone 40 mg/m2/d orally on days 1 to 14 (CMFP) for six cycles (24 weeks) with epirubicin recommended as second-line therapy. Results: A total of 209 eligible patients were randomized with a median survival duration of 17.3 months for paclitaxel and 13.9 months for CMFP. Multivariate analysis showed that patients who received paclitaxel survived significantly longer than those who received CMFP (P = .025). Paclitaxel produced significantly less severe leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, mucositis, documented infections (all P < .001), nausea or vomiting (P = .003), and fever without documented infection (P = .007), and less hospitalization for febrile neutropenia than did CMFP (P = .001). Alopecia, peripheral neuropathy, and myalgia or arthralgia were more severe with paclitaxel (all P < .0001). Overall, quality of life was similar for both treatments (P ≥ .07). Conclusion: Initial paclitaxel was associated with significantly less myelosuppression and fewer infections, with longer survival and similar quality of life and control of metastatic breast cancer compared with CMFP.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032809977&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/jco.1999.17.8.2355
DO - 10.1200/jco.1999.17.8.2355
M3 - Article
C2 - 10561297
AN - SCOPUS:0032809977
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 17
SP - 2355
EP - 2364
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 8
ER -