Innovation to improve learning outcomes: what are we missing?

Ian P. Johnson

    Research output: Contribution to journalConference paperpeer-review

    Abstract

    Most evaluations of educational innovation focus on student satisfaction. Effects on learning outcomes are infrequently reported, and where they have been, they are often unchanged (Lee 2011) or mixed (Mahler et al., 2011). Here, I reflect on studies of innovation published with colleagues and suggest that the mismatch between student satisfaction and learning outcomes can be explained by confounding variables affecting the internal validity of the studies that are primarily related to constructive alignment (Biggs & Tang 2011) and observer effects (Pigott et el., 2013).
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)45-46
    Number of pages2
    JournalProceedings of the Australian Conference on Science and Mathematics Education
    Volume2018
    Publication statusPublished - 2018
    EventThe Australian Conference of Science and Mathematics Education 2018: (23rd Annual Uniserve Science Conference) - Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
    Duration: 26 Sept 201828 Sept 2018

    Keywords

    • innovation
    • evaluation
    • learning outcomes
    • student satisfaction

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Innovation to improve learning outcomes: what are we missing?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this