Innovative transition matrix techniques for measuring extreme risk: An Australian and U.S. comparison

D. E. Allen, A. R. Kramadibrata, R. J. Powell, A. K. Singh

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding contributionResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Comparing Australia and the U.S. both prior to and during the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), using a dataset which includes more than six hundred companies, this paper modifies traditional transition matrix credit risk modelling to address two important issues. Firstly, extreme credit risk can have a devastating impact on financial institutions, economies and markets as highlighted by the GFC. It is therefore essential that extreme credit risk is accurately measured and understood. Transition matrix methodology, which measures the probability of a borrower transitioning from one credit rating to another, is traditionally used to measure Value at Risk (VaR), a measure of risk below a specified threshold. An alternate measure to VaR is Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR), which was initially developed in the insurance industry and has been gaining popularity as a measure of extreme market risk. CVaR measures those risks beyond VaR. We incorporate CVaR into transition matrix methodology to measure extreme credit risk. We find significant differences in the VaR and CVaR measurements in both the US and Australian markets, as CVaR captures those extreme risks that are ignored by VaR. We also find a greater differential between VaR and CVaR for the US as compared to Australia, reflecting the more extreme credit risk that was experienced in the US during the GFC. The second issue is that relative industry risk does not stay static over time, as highlighted by the problems experienced by financial sector during the GFC. Traditional transition matrix methodology assumes that all borrowers of the same credit rating transition equally, whereas we incorporate an adjustment based on industry share price fluctuations to allow for unequal transition among industries. The existing CreditPortfolioView model applies industry adjustment factors to credit transition based on macroeconomic variables. The financial sector regulator in Australia, APRA, has found that banks do not favour such credit modelling based on macroeconomic variables due to modelling complexity and forecasting inaccuracy. We use our own iTransition model, which incorporates industry factors derived from equity prices, a much simpler approach than macroeconomic modelling. The iTransition model shows a greater change between Pre-GFC and GFC total credit risk than the traditional model. This means that those industries that were riskiest during the GFC are not the same industries that were riskiest Pre-GFC. The iTransition model also finds that the Australian portfolio, which has a much higher weighting towards financial stocks than the US portfolio, transitions very differently to the more balanced industry-weighted US portfolio. These results highlight the importance of including industry analysis into credit risk modelling. To ensure a thorough analysis of the topic we use various approaches to measuring CVaR. This includes an analytical approach which is based on actual credit ratings as well as a Monte Carlo simulation approach which generates twenty thousand observations for each entity in the data set. We also incorporate historical default probabilities into the model in two different ways, one method using an average historical default rate over time, and the other method using annual default probabilities which vary from year to year. Overall, this comprehensive analysis finds that innovative modelling techniques are better able to account for the impact of extreme risk circumstances and industry composition than traditional transition matrix techniques.

LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationMODSIM 2011
Subtitle of host publication19th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation: proceedings
EditorsF. Chan, D. Marinova, R. S. Anderssen
Place of PublicationCanberra
Pages1451-1456
Number of pages6
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes
Event19th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation - Sustaining Our Future: Understanding and Living with Uncertainty, MODSIM2011 - Perth, WA, Australia
Duration: 12 Dec 201116 Dec 2011

Conference

Conference19th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation - Sustaining Our Future: Understanding and Living with Uncertainty, MODSIM2011
CountryAustralia
CityPerth, WA
Period12/12/1116/12/11

Fingerprint

Transition Matrix
Financial Crisis
Conditional Value at Risk
Extremes
Credit Risk
Industry
Value at Risk
Credit Rating
Macroeconomics
Modeling
Methodology
Adjustment
Sector
Model
Risk Measures
Equity
Unequal
Insurance
Regulator
Alternate

Keywords

  • Credit models
  • Credit value at risk
  • Probability of default

Cite this

Allen, D. E., Kramadibrata, A. R., Powell, R. J., & Singh, A. K. (2011). Innovative transition matrix techniques for measuring extreme risk: An Australian and U.S. comparison. In F. Chan, D. Marinova, & R. S. Anderssen (Eds.), MODSIM 2011: 19th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation: proceedings (pp. 1451-1456). Canberra.
Allen, D. E. ; Kramadibrata, A. R. ; Powell, R. J. ; Singh, A. K. / Innovative transition matrix techniques for measuring extreme risk : An Australian and U.S. comparison. MODSIM 2011: 19th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation: proceedings. editor / F. Chan ; D. Marinova ; R. S. Anderssen. Canberra, 2011. pp. 1451-1456
@inproceedings{347601f55ee8450c994ce830dd4dcefa,
title = "Innovative transition matrix techniques for measuring extreme risk: An Australian and U.S. comparison",
abstract = "Comparing Australia and the U.S. both prior to and during the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), using a dataset which includes more than six hundred companies, this paper modifies traditional transition matrix credit risk modelling to address two important issues. Firstly, extreme credit risk can have a devastating impact on financial institutions, economies and markets as highlighted by the GFC. It is therefore essential that extreme credit risk is accurately measured and understood. Transition matrix methodology, which measures the probability of a borrower transitioning from one credit rating to another, is traditionally used to measure Value at Risk (VaR), a measure of risk below a specified threshold. An alternate measure to VaR is Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR), which was initially developed in the insurance industry and has been gaining popularity as a measure of extreme market risk. CVaR measures those risks beyond VaR. We incorporate CVaR into transition matrix methodology to measure extreme credit risk. We find significant differences in the VaR and CVaR measurements in both the US and Australian markets, as CVaR captures those extreme risks that are ignored by VaR. We also find a greater differential between VaR and CVaR for the US as compared to Australia, reflecting the more extreme credit risk that was experienced in the US during the GFC. The second issue is that relative industry risk does not stay static over time, as highlighted by the problems experienced by financial sector during the GFC. Traditional transition matrix methodology assumes that all borrowers of the same credit rating transition equally, whereas we incorporate an adjustment based on industry share price fluctuations to allow for unequal transition among industries. The existing CreditPortfolioView model applies industry adjustment factors to credit transition based on macroeconomic variables. The financial sector regulator in Australia, APRA, has found that banks do not favour such credit modelling based on macroeconomic variables due to modelling complexity and forecasting inaccuracy. We use our own iTransition model, which incorporates industry factors derived from equity prices, a much simpler approach than macroeconomic modelling. The iTransition model shows a greater change between Pre-GFC and GFC total credit risk than the traditional model. This means that those industries that were riskiest during the GFC are not the same industries that were riskiest Pre-GFC. The iTransition model also finds that the Australian portfolio, which has a much higher weighting towards financial stocks than the US portfolio, transitions very differently to the more balanced industry-weighted US portfolio. These results highlight the importance of including industry analysis into credit risk modelling. To ensure a thorough analysis of the topic we use various approaches to measuring CVaR. This includes an analytical approach which is based on actual credit ratings as well as a Monte Carlo simulation approach which generates twenty thousand observations for each entity in the data set. We also incorporate historical default probabilities into the model in two different ways, one method using an average historical default rate over time, and the other method using annual default probabilities which vary from year to year. Overall, this comprehensive analysis finds that innovative modelling techniques are better able to account for the impact of extreme risk circumstances and industry composition than traditional transition matrix techniques.",
keywords = "Credit models, Credit value at risk, Probability of default",
author = "Allen, {D. E.} and Kramadibrata, {A. R.} and Powell, {R. J.} and Singh, {A. K.}",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780987214317",
pages = "1451--1456",
editor = "F. Chan and D. Marinova and Anderssen, {R. S.}",
booktitle = "MODSIM 2011",

}

Allen, DE, Kramadibrata, AR, Powell, RJ & Singh, AK 2011, Innovative transition matrix techniques for measuring extreme risk: An Australian and U.S. comparison. in F Chan, D Marinova & RS Anderssen (eds), MODSIM 2011: 19th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation: proceedings. Canberra, pp. 1451-1456, 19th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation - Sustaining Our Future: Understanding and Living with Uncertainty, MODSIM2011, Perth, WA, Australia, 12/12/11.

Innovative transition matrix techniques for measuring extreme risk : An Australian and U.S. comparison. / Allen, D. E.; Kramadibrata, A. R.; Powell, R. J.; Singh, A. K.

MODSIM 2011: 19th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation: proceedings. ed. / F. Chan; D. Marinova; R. S. Anderssen. Canberra, 2011. p. 1451-1456.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding contributionResearchpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Innovative transition matrix techniques for measuring extreme risk

T2 - An Australian and U.S. comparison

AU - Allen, D. E.

AU - Kramadibrata, A. R.

AU - Powell, R. J.

AU - Singh, A. K.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Comparing Australia and the U.S. both prior to and during the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), using a dataset which includes more than six hundred companies, this paper modifies traditional transition matrix credit risk modelling to address two important issues. Firstly, extreme credit risk can have a devastating impact on financial institutions, economies and markets as highlighted by the GFC. It is therefore essential that extreme credit risk is accurately measured and understood. Transition matrix methodology, which measures the probability of a borrower transitioning from one credit rating to another, is traditionally used to measure Value at Risk (VaR), a measure of risk below a specified threshold. An alternate measure to VaR is Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR), which was initially developed in the insurance industry and has been gaining popularity as a measure of extreme market risk. CVaR measures those risks beyond VaR. We incorporate CVaR into transition matrix methodology to measure extreme credit risk. We find significant differences in the VaR and CVaR measurements in both the US and Australian markets, as CVaR captures those extreme risks that are ignored by VaR. We also find a greater differential between VaR and CVaR for the US as compared to Australia, reflecting the more extreme credit risk that was experienced in the US during the GFC. The second issue is that relative industry risk does not stay static over time, as highlighted by the problems experienced by financial sector during the GFC. Traditional transition matrix methodology assumes that all borrowers of the same credit rating transition equally, whereas we incorporate an adjustment based on industry share price fluctuations to allow for unequal transition among industries. The existing CreditPortfolioView model applies industry adjustment factors to credit transition based on macroeconomic variables. The financial sector regulator in Australia, APRA, has found that banks do not favour such credit modelling based on macroeconomic variables due to modelling complexity and forecasting inaccuracy. We use our own iTransition model, which incorporates industry factors derived from equity prices, a much simpler approach than macroeconomic modelling. The iTransition model shows a greater change between Pre-GFC and GFC total credit risk than the traditional model. This means that those industries that were riskiest during the GFC are not the same industries that were riskiest Pre-GFC. The iTransition model also finds that the Australian portfolio, which has a much higher weighting towards financial stocks than the US portfolio, transitions very differently to the more balanced industry-weighted US portfolio. These results highlight the importance of including industry analysis into credit risk modelling. To ensure a thorough analysis of the topic we use various approaches to measuring CVaR. This includes an analytical approach which is based on actual credit ratings as well as a Monte Carlo simulation approach which generates twenty thousand observations for each entity in the data set. We also incorporate historical default probabilities into the model in two different ways, one method using an average historical default rate over time, and the other method using annual default probabilities which vary from year to year. Overall, this comprehensive analysis finds that innovative modelling techniques are better able to account for the impact of extreme risk circumstances and industry composition than traditional transition matrix techniques.

AB - Comparing Australia and the U.S. both prior to and during the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), using a dataset which includes more than six hundred companies, this paper modifies traditional transition matrix credit risk modelling to address two important issues. Firstly, extreme credit risk can have a devastating impact on financial institutions, economies and markets as highlighted by the GFC. It is therefore essential that extreme credit risk is accurately measured and understood. Transition matrix methodology, which measures the probability of a borrower transitioning from one credit rating to another, is traditionally used to measure Value at Risk (VaR), a measure of risk below a specified threshold. An alternate measure to VaR is Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR), which was initially developed in the insurance industry and has been gaining popularity as a measure of extreme market risk. CVaR measures those risks beyond VaR. We incorporate CVaR into transition matrix methodology to measure extreme credit risk. We find significant differences in the VaR and CVaR measurements in both the US and Australian markets, as CVaR captures those extreme risks that are ignored by VaR. We also find a greater differential between VaR and CVaR for the US as compared to Australia, reflecting the more extreme credit risk that was experienced in the US during the GFC. The second issue is that relative industry risk does not stay static over time, as highlighted by the problems experienced by financial sector during the GFC. Traditional transition matrix methodology assumes that all borrowers of the same credit rating transition equally, whereas we incorporate an adjustment based on industry share price fluctuations to allow for unequal transition among industries. The existing CreditPortfolioView model applies industry adjustment factors to credit transition based on macroeconomic variables. The financial sector regulator in Australia, APRA, has found that banks do not favour such credit modelling based on macroeconomic variables due to modelling complexity and forecasting inaccuracy. We use our own iTransition model, which incorporates industry factors derived from equity prices, a much simpler approach than macroeconomic modelling. The iTransition model shows a greater change between Pre-GFC and GFC total credit risk than the traditional model. This means that those industries that were riskiest during the GFC are not the same industries that were riskiest Pre-GFC. The iTransition model also finds that the Australian portfolio, which has a much higher weighting towards financial stocks than the US portfolio, transitions very differently to the more balanced industry-weighted US portfolio. These results highlight the importance of including industry analysis into credit risk modelling. To ensure a thorough analysis of the topic we use various approaches to measuring CVaR. This includes an analytical approach which is based on actual credit ratings as well as a Monte Carlo simulation approach which generates twenty thousand observations for each entity in the data set. We also incorporate historical default probabilities into the model in two different ways, one method using an average historical default rate over time, and the other method using annual default probabilities which vary from year to year. Overall, this comprehensive analysis finds that innovative modelling techniques are better able to account for the impact of extreme risk circumstances and industry composition than traditional transition matrix techniques.

KW - Credit models

KW - Credit value at risk

KW - Probability of default

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863419871&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference proceeding contribution

SN - 9780987214317

SP - 1451

EP - 1456

BT - MODSIM 2011

A2 - Chan, F.

A2 - Marinova, D.

A2 - Anderssen, R. S.

CY - Canberra

ER -

Allen DE, Kramadibrata AR, Powell RJ, Singh AK. Innovative transition matrix techniques for measuring extreme risk: An Australian and U.S. comparison. In Chan F, Marinova D, Anderssen RS, editors, MODSIM 2011: 19th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation: proceedings. Canberra. 2011. p. 1451-1456