Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Institutional shareholder distraction and workplace safety

Hasibul Chowdhury, Hien Duc Han, Chandrasekhar Krishnamurti, Jiayi Zheng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study examines the impact of institutional shareholder distraction on a firm's ability to maintain a safe workplace environment. By utilising extreme returns of firms in unrelated industries of institutional shareholders' portfolios as exogenous indicators of investor distraction, we demonstrate that institutional investor distraction is associated with a higher incidence of workplace injuries. A one standard deviation increase in the institutional distraction measure is associated with an increase of about 11.16 % in injury rates compared to the mean injury rate. Our channel tests indicate that this negative relation between institutional distraction and workplace safety results from reduced monitoring efforts by distracted institutional investors, fostering managerial short-termism. Our baseline finding remains consistent across a series of robustness and endogeneity tests. Cross-sectional analysis reveals that the association between institutional distraction and workplace injuries is more pronounced in companies with weaker governance and greater information asymmetry.
Original languageEnglish
Article number101671
Pages (from-to)1-27
Number of pages27
JournalThe British Accounting Review
Volume58
Issue number3
Early online date25 Apr 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2026

Bibliographical note

© 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • Distracted institutional shareholders
  • Occupational injury
  • Occupational illness

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Institutional shareholder distraction and workplace safety'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this