Institutionalization or wither away? Twenty-five years of environmental policy integration under shifting governance models in Sweden

Åsa Persson*, Katarina Eckerberg, Måns Nilsson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Snapshot views of environmental policy integration (EPI) practices fail to consider the stability of EPI over time – both as aspiration and performance. This paper reviews the evolution of EPI over more than two decades at the national level in the agriculture and energy sectors in Sweden – an EPI pioneer. We study how the extent of EPI stability can be explained partly by shifting political priorities by governments and partly by underlying governance models (actors and organizational landscape and policy instruments used). Comparing the two sectors, the institutionalization of EPI appears to be stronger in the energy sector. In the agricultural sector, the current reform of the Common Agricultural Policy seems to imply decreasing prominence of EPI – due to shrinking budgets for environmental targets along with greater policy goals complexity. Overall, observed shifts in governance have been mildly conducive to EPI by providing an infrastructure, but further enhancements require clear political priority awarded to the environment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)478-495
Number of pages18
JournalEnvironment and Planning C: Government and Policy
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • agriculture
  • energy
  • environmental policy
  • governance
  • integration

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Institutionalization or wither away? Twenty-five years of environmental policy integration under shifting governance models in Sweden'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this