Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

International consensuses and guidelines on rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) surgery by the Asia-Pacific Vitreo-retina Society (APVRS), the Academy of Asia-Pacific Professors of Ophthalmology (AAPPO) and the Academia Retina Internationalis (ARI)

Paisan Ruamviboonsuk*, Nishant V. Radke, Mary Ho, Chi Chun Lai, Wai Ching Lam, William F. Mieler, Mahesh P. Shanmugam, Chi Wai Tsang, Doric W. K. Wong, Peranut Chotcomwongse, Nicola Y. Gan, Pei Ting Lu, Sriram Simakurthy, Simon K. H. Szeto, Francesco M. Bandello, Andrew Chang, Lu Chen, Jay Chhablani, Adrian T. Fung, Min KimTao Li, Xiaorong Li, Jennifer I. Lim, Kyu Hyung Park, Tunde Peto, Hiroko Terasaki, Rajiv Raman, Dennis S. C. Lam*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: To establish expert consensus on the contemporary surgical management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) using a structured Delphi approach. Methods: A panel of experienced vitreoretinal surgeons participated in a multiround Delphi survey evaluating statements related to surgical approach, vitrectomy techniques, tamponade selection, anesthesia, postoperative care, special populations, and future technologies. Consensus was defined as ≥ 75 % agreement. Voting outcomes were analyzed to identify areas of agreement and topics requiring further discussion. Results: Strong consensus emerged on tailoring surgical choice to patient age, lens status, and retinal break characteristics. Scleral buckle (SB) was preferred in younger, phakic patients, while pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) was favored in pseudophakic eyes and complex detachments. Pneumatic retinopexy was supported for limited superior breaks. Small-gauge vitrectomy (23–27 gauge, G), meticulous peripheral vitreous management, and judicious use of perfluorocarbon liquids were widely endorsed. Postoperative positioning, careful intraocular pressure monitoring, and early intervention for macula-on detachments were emphasized. Moreover, macula-off retinal detachment (RD) may carry good prognosis especially in young patients. Areas of ongoing debate included the comparative benefit of PPV versus SB depending on lens status, the default use of silicone oil in complex detachments, and adoption of 27 G+ instruments in pediatric cases. Emerging technologies, including widefield imaging, intraoperative optical coherence tomography, artificial intelligence–assisted analysis, and pharmacologic adjuvants, were recognized as promising but require further validation. Conclusions: This Delphi study provides structured guidance on RRD management while identifying areas of ongoing debate. Consistently, individualized surgical strategy, meticulous vitreous management, and careful postoperative care remain central to optimizing anatomical and functional outcomes, highlighting the importance of clinical judgment in evolving surgical practice.

Original languageEnglish
Article number100254
Pages (from-to)1-30
Number of pages30
JournalAsia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume14
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Oct 2025

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2025. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • Consensus
  • Delphi
  • Macula-off RD
  • Pneumatic retinopexy
  • Retinal detachment

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'International consensuses and guidelines on rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) surgery by the Asia-Pacific Vitreo-retina Society (APVRS), the Academy of Asia-Pacific Professors of Ophthalmology (AAPPO) and the Academia Retina Internationalis (ARI)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this