International peacekeeping and conflict resolution: a taxonomic analysis with implications

Paul F. Diehl*, Daniel Druckman, James A. Wall

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

77 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

International peacekeeping has undergone some dramatic changes in the past decade. This study represents what is one of the few systematic attempts to classify peacekeeping missions according to function. Yet the authors do not stop their investigation at this juncture. Using a theoretical framework derived from the scholarly literature on conflict management and resolution, the authors are able to scale different peacekeeping functions along two dimensions (primary vs. third-party roles and integrative vs. distributive processes) and understand their interrelationships. For example, how compatible might be the functions of traditional peacekeeping with newer roles such as nation building? From these results, implications for building theory in peacekeeping studies as well as more practical concerns, such as how peacekeeping soldiers might be trained for different missions, are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)33-55
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Conflict Resolution
Volume42
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Feb 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'International peacekeeping and conflict resolution: a taxonomic analysis with implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this