Interpretive theories

Dworkin, Sunstein and Ely

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Examination of modern judicial interpretivism - comparative analysis of the theories of Dworkin, Sunstein and Ely, including their advantages and disadvantages - summary of Fardon case - illustrates how interpretive theories are applied in judicial decision making.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)78-101
Number of pages24
JournalBond Law Review
Volume17
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2005
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • interpretive theory
  • judicial interpretivism
  • Dworkin
  • Sunstein
  • Ely

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Interpretive theories: Dworkin, Sunstein and Ely'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this