Abstract
Examination of modern judicial interpretivism - comparative analysis of the theories of Dworkin, Sunstein and Ely, including their advantages and disadvantages - summary of Fardon case - illustrates how interpretive theories are applied in judicial decision making.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 78-101 |
Number of pages | 24 |
Journal | Bond Law Review |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 2 |
Publication status | Published - Dec 2005 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- interpretive theory
- judicial interpretivism
- Dworkin
- Sunstein
- Ely