Abstract
Examination of modern judicial interpretivism - comparative analysis of the theories of Dworkin, Sunstein and Ely, including their advantages and disadvantages - summary of Fardon case - illustrates how interpretive theories are applied in judicial decision making.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 78-101 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Bond Law Review |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2005 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- interpretive theory
- judicial interpretivism
- Dworkin
- Sunstein
- Ely