Interprofessional collaboration in hospitals

a critical, broad-based review of the literature

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) is a common term applied in the healthcare literature, with suggestions it contributes to improved quality and safety of patient care across the globe. Despite worldwide implementation of models of IPC, past systematic or meta-reviews on this topic have concluded that the evidence is mixed. However, these reviews are yet to adequately consider the qualitative and mixed-methods literature on this topic. In this critical review, we synthesize the outcomes and key findings of IPC in hospitals, taking a broader approach by including diverse study designs. A total of 4,776 abstracts were screened from three major databases (Medline, CINAHL, Embase). Thirty-four studies fulfilled inclusion criteria. Although outcomes and key findings (e.g., staff turnover, error rates) were mostly positive, there were inconsistencies in the results. The included studies reflected a variety of study designs and different methodological approaches. Overall, our review revealed moderate evidence that IPC can positively influence patient, staff and organizational factors in hospitals, and that inconsistent findings may be due to variation in context (e.g., the cohort of patients). Recommendations from the review are to incorporate qualitative- and mixed-methods approaches to studying IPC in healthcare and tailor evaluations of IPC outcomes specific to the context.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Interprofessional Care
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 13 Jan 2020

Keywords

  • collaboration
  • context
  • hospital
  • interprofessional
  • Review
  • team

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Interprofessional collaboration in hospitals: a critical, broad-based review of the literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this