Intersections between climate change law and the World Trade Organization

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The need to balance economic growth and sustainable development remains a shared goal within the international community. One of the ways to achieve this balance is to promote a green economy, whereby states can continue to pursue economic growth whilst reducing the environmental and social footprint originating from their economic activities. Providing financial incentives for cleaner energy production, promoting green technology and introducing a cost for carbon pollution are some of the policy solutions that states have implemented to combat climate change.
The international trade law framework is now confronted with emerging challenges where paradigms of free trade conflict with climate change policies. The World Trade Organization (WTO), the General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs (GATT) and other multilateral trade agreements including the Subsidies and Counter Measures (SCM), Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) and Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreements, play a central role in maintaining a system of open international trade to ensure that states do not unjustifiably discriminate between foreign and locally produced goods and services.
Herein lie a range of problems: what if climate change policy possesses trade distorting impacts that undermine the system of open international trade? How have specific climate change measures been treated by the WTO and dispute resolution bodies? Can the WTO distinguish between legitimate climate change policies against policies which unjustifiably restrict trade in foreign goods? And importantly, how has the WTO responded to fundamental shifts in what tomorrow’s economy should look like, namely, from trade liberalisation to sustainable development?
With the rise of climate change as the leading environmental issue of the twenty-first century, there has been a significant shift in attention towards limiting anthropogenic global warming and restraining the levels of carbon dioxide emitted from economic activity. This chapter will examine the above questions and the role of the WTO to explore the intersection between climate change policy and international trade law. By doing so, this chapter will explore how climate change action can operationalize concepts that are inherent in both international trade and environmental law, namely, common but differentiated responsibilities (CBDR) and special and differentiated treatment (SBT) to illustrate that the two, distinct legal regimes share the same path towards achieving sustainable development.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationResearch Handbook on Transnational Environmental Law
EditorsVeerle Heyvaert, Leslie-Anne Duvic-Paoli
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2020

Fingerprint

WTO
climate change
world trade
Law
trade law
international law
sustainable development
economic growth
energy production
GATT
economy
environmental law
trade policy
intellectual property
free trade
right of ownership
twenty-first century
subsidy
liberalization
economics

Cite this

Alam, S. (Accepted/In press). Intersections between climate change law and the World Trade Organization. In V. Heyvaert, & L-A. Duvic-Paoli (Eds.), Research Handbook on Transnational Environmental Law Edward Elgar Publishing.
Alam, Shawkat. / Intersections between climate change law and the World Trade Organization. Research Handbook on Transnational Environmental Law . editor / Veerle Heyvaert ; Leslie-Anne Duvic-Paoli. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020.
@inbook{b88d936a7bd34749a3eda83487908e04,
title = "Intersections between climate change law and the World Trade Organization",
abstract = "The need to balance economic growth and sustainable development remains a shared goal within the international community. One of the ways to achieve this balance is to promote a green economy, whereby states can continue to pursue economic growth whilst reducing the environmental and social footprint originating from their economic activities. Providing financial incentives for cleaner energy production, promoting green technology and introducing a cost for carbon pollution are some of the policy solutions that states have implemented to combat climate change.The international trade law framework is now confronted with emerging challenges where paradigms of free trade conflict with climate change policies. The World Trade Organization (WTO), the General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs (GATT) and other multilateral trade agreements including the Subsidies and Counter Measures (SCM), Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) and Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreements, play a central role in maintaining a system of open international trade to ensure that states do not unjustifiably discriminate between foreign and locally produced goods and services.Herein lie a range of problems: what if climate change policy possesses trade distorting impacts that undermine the system of open international trade? How have specific climate change measures been treated by the WTO and dispute resolution bodies? Can the WTO distinguish between legitimate climate change policies against policies which unjustifiably restrict trade in foreign goods? And importantly, how has the WTO responded to fundamental shifts in what tomorrow’s economy should look like, namely, from trade liberalisation to sustainable development?With the rise of climate change as the leading environmental issue of the twenty-first century, there has been a significant shift in attention towards limiting anthropogenic global warming and restraining the levels of carbon dioxide emitted from economic activity. This chapter will examine the above questions and the role of the WTO to explore the intersection between climate change policy and international trade law. By doing so, this chapter will explore how climate change action can operationalize concepts that are inherent in both international trade and environmental law, namely, common but differentiated responsibilities (CBDR) and special and differentiated treatment (SBT) to illustrate that the two, distinct legal regimes share the same path towards achieving sustainable development.",
keywords = "Climate change, International Trade, WTO, Transnational Environmental Law",
author = "Shawkat Alam",
year = "2020",
language = "English",
editor = "Veerle Heyvaert and Duvic-Paoli, {Leslie-Anne }",
booktitle = "Research Handbook on Transnational Environmental Law",
publisher = "Edward Elgar Publishing",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Alam, S 2020, Intersections between climate change law and the World Trade Organization. in V Heyvaert & L-A Duvic-Paoli (eds), Research Handbook on Transnational Environmental Law . Edward Elgar Publishing.

Intersections between climate change law and the World Trade Organization. / Alam, Shawkat.

Research Handbook on Transnational Environmental Law . ed. / Veerle Heyvaert; Leslie-Anne Duvic-Paoli. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Intersections between climate change law and the World Trade Organization

AU - Alam,Shawkat

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - The need to balance economic growth and sustainable development remains a shared goal within the international community. One of the ways to achieve this balance is to promote a green economy, whereby states can continue to pursue economic growth whilst reducing the environmental and social footprint originating from their economic activities. Providing financial incentives for cleaner energy production, promoting green technology and introducing a cost for carbon pollution are some of the policy solutions that states have implemented to combat climate change.The international trade law framework is now confronted with emerging challenges where paradigms of free trade conflict with climate change policies. The World Trade Organization (WTO), the General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs (GATT) and other multilateral trade agreements including the Subsidies and Counter Measures (SCM), Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) and Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreements, play a central role in maintaining a system of open international trade to ensure that states do not unjustifiably discriminate between foreign and locally produced goods and services.Herein lie a range of problems: what if climate change policy possesses trade distorting impacts that undermine the system of open international trade? How have specific climate change measures been treated by the WTO and dispute resolution bodies? Can the WTO distinguish between legitimate climate change policies against policies which unjustifiably restrict trade in foreign goods? And importantly, how has the WTO responded to fundamental shifts in what tomorrow’s economy should look like, namely, from trade liberalisation to sustainable development?With the rise of climate change as the leading environmental issue of the twenty-first century, there has been a significant shift in attention towards limiting anthropogenic global warming and restraining the levels of carbon dioxide emitted from economic activity. This chapter will examine the above questions and the role of the WTO to explore the intersection between climate change policy and international trade law. By doing so, this chapter will explore how climate change action can operationalize concepts that are inherent in both international trade and environmental law, namely, common but differentiated responsibilities (CBDR) and special and differentiated treatment (SBT) to illustrate that the two, distinct legal regimes share the same path towards achieving sustainable development.

AB - The need to balance economic growth and sustainable development remains a shared goal within the international community. One of the ways to achieve this balance is to promote a green economy, whereby states can continue to pursue economic growth whilst reducing the environmental and social footprint originating from their economic activities. Providing financial incentives for cleaner energy production, promoting green technology and introducing a cost for carbon pollution are some of the policy solutions that states have implemented to combat climate change.The international trade law framework is now confronted with emerging challenges where paradigms of free trade conflict with climate change policies. The World Trade Organization (WTO), the General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs (GATT) and other multilateral trade agreements including the Subsidies and Counter Measures (SCM), Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) and Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreements, play a central role in maintaining a system of open international trade to ensure that states do not unjustifiably discriminate between foreign and locally produced goods and services.Herein lie a range of problems: what if climate change policy possesses trade distorting impacts that undermine the system of open international trade? How have specific climate change measures been treated by the WTO and dispute resolution bodies? Can the WTO distinguish between legitimate climate change policies against policies which unjustifiably restrict trade in foreign goods? And importantly, how has the WTO responded to fundamental shifts in what tomorrow’s economy should look like, namely, from trade liberalisation to sustainable development?With the rise of climate change as the leading environmental issue of the twenty-first century, there has been a significant shift in attention towards limiting anthropogenic global warming and restraining the levels of carbon dioxide emitted from economic activity. This chapter will examine the above questions and the role of the WTO to explore the intersection between climate change policy and international trade law. By doing so, this chapter will explore how climate change action can operationalize concepts that are inherent in both international trade and environmental law, namely, common but differentiated responsibilities (CBDR) and special and differentiated treatment (SBT) to illustrate that the two, distinct legal regimes share the same path towards achieving sustainable development.

KW - Climate change

KW - International Trade

KW - WTO

KW - Transnational Environmental Law

M3 - Chapter

BT - Research Handbook on Transnational Environmental Law

PB - Edward Elgar Publishing

ER -

Alam S. Intersections between climate change law and the World Trade Organization. In Heyvaert V, Duvic-Paoli L-A, editors, Research Handbook on Transnational Environmental Law . Edward Elgar Publishing. 2020