TY - JOUR
T1 - Investigating the model of community-based case management in the New South Wales brain injury rehabilitation program
T2 - a prospective multicenter study
AU - Simpson, Grahame
AU - Mitsch, Virginia
AU - Doyle, Margaret
AU - Forman, Marcella
AU - Young, Denise
AU - Solomon, Vicki
AU - Macpherson, Margaret
AU - Gillett, Lauren
AU - Strettles, Barbara
PY - 2018/11/1
Y1 - 2018/11/1
N2 - Objective: To investigate a model of community-based case management (CM). Setting: New South Wales (NSW) Brain Injury Rehabilitation Program (BIRP). Participants: All clinicians (N = 72) providing CM within 14 BIRP community rehabilitation teams. Design: A prospective, multicenter study. Main Measures: A purpose-designed survey. Methods: Participants from the 12 adult and 2 pediatric services (8 located in metropolitan areas, 6 in rural areas) completed a 3-part survey investigating their organizational context, clinical approach, and CM interventions. Between-groups analyses explored differences among individual services, as well as differences based on age (adult vs pediatric) and location (metropolitan vs rural). Results: All services provided a direct service model of CM. The underlying principles were uniform across services (more direct than indirect service provision; with more client-related than administrative-related tasks; more holistic than service-led in defining client needs; with decision making equally directed by staff and clients; and undertaking a more comprehensive than minimalist range of tasks). CM interventions included the provision of individual support, family support, advocacy, and community development alongside assessment, monitoring, referral, and liaison tasks. There were little differences in practice based on age or location. Conclusion: The NSW BIRP has drawn upon the results to produce a model of service for CM.
AB - Objective: To investigate a model of community-based case management (CM). Setting: New South Wales (NSW) Brain Injury Rehabilitation Program (BIRP). Participants: All clinicians (N = 72) providing CM within 14 BIRP community rehabilitation teams. Design: A prospective, multicenter study. Main Measures: A purpose-designed survey. Methods: Participants from the 12 adult and 2 pediatric services (8 located in metropolitan areas, 6 in rural areas) completed a 3-part survey investigating their organizational context, clinical approach, and CM interventions. Between-groups analyses explored differences among individual services, as well as differences based on age (adult vs pediatric) and location (metropolitan vs rural). Results: All services provided a direct service model of CM. The underlying principles were uniform across services (more direct than indirect service provision; with more client-related than administrative-related tasks; more holistic than service-led in defining client needs; with decision making equally directed by staff and clients; and undertaking a more comprehensive than minimalist range of tasks). CM interventions included the provision of individual support, family support, advocacy, and community development alongside assessment, monitoring, referral, and liaison tasks. There were little differences in practice based on age or location. Conclusion: The NSW BIRP has drawn upon the results to produce a model of service for CM.
KW - acquired brain injury
KW - case management
KW - pediatric
KW - rehabilitation
KW - rural
KW - service model
KW - traumatic brain injury
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056284229&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000370
DO - 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000370
M3 - Article
C2 - 29385013
AN - SCOPUS:85056284229
SN - 0885-9701
VL - 33
SP - E38-E48
JO - Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
JF - Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
IS - 6
ER -