Is biblioleaks inevitable?

Adam G. Dunn, Enrico Coiera, Kenneth D. Mandl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In 2014, the vast majority of published biomedical research is still hidden behind paywalls rather than open access. For more than a decade, similar restrictions over other digitally available content have engendered illegal activity. Music file sharing became rampant in the late 1990s as communities formed around new ways to share. The frequency and scale of cyber-attacks against commercial and government interests has increased dramatically. Massive troves of classified government documents have become public through the actions of a few. Yet we have not seen significant growth in the illegal sharing of peer-reviewed academic articles. Should we truly expect that biomedical publishing is somehow at less risk than other content-generating industries? What of the larger threat-a "Biblioleaks" event-a database breach and public leak of the substantial archives of biomedical literature? As the expectation that all research should be available to everyone becomes the norm for a younger generation of researchers and the broader community, the motivations for such a leak are likely to grow. We explore the feasibility and consequences of a Biblioleaks event for researchers, journals, publishers, and the broader communities of doctors and the patients they serve.

LanguageEnglish
Article numbere112
Pages1-7
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Medical Internet Research
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Research Personnel
Music
Biomedical Research
Industry
Databases
Growth
Research

Cite this

Dunn, Adam G. ; Coiera, Enrico ; Mandl, Kenneth D. / Is biblioleaks inevitable?. In: Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2014 ; Vol. 16, No. 4. pp. 1-7.
@article{684aa90476e3406396c68ceb924c99b3,
title = "Is biblioleaks inevitable?",
abstract = "In 2014, the vast majority of published biomedical research is still hidden behind paywalls rather than open access. For more than a decade, similar restrictions over other digitally available content have engendered illegal activity. Music file sharing became rampant in the late 1990s as communities formed around new ways to share. The frequency and scale of cyber-attacks against commercial and government interests has increased dramatically. Massive troves of classified government documents have become public through the actions of a few. Yet we have not seen significant growth in the illegal sharing of peer-reviewed academic articles. Should we truly expect that biomedical publishing is somehow at less risk than other content-generating industries? What of the larger threat-a {"}Biblioleaks{"} event-a database breach and public leak of the substantial archives of biomedical literature? As the expectation that all research should be available to everyone becomes the norm for a younger generation of researchers and the broader community, the motivations for such a leak are likely to grow. We explore the feasibility and consequences of a Biblioleaks event for researchers, journals, publishers, and the broader communities of doctors and the patients they serve.",
author = "Dunn, {Adam G.} and Enrico Coiera and Mandl, {Kenneth D.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.2196/jmir.3331",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "1--7",
journal = "Journal of Medical Internet Research",
issn = "1438-8871",
publisher = "JMIR PUBLICATIONS, INC",
number = "4",

}

Is biblioleaks inevitable? / Dunn, Adam G.; Coiera, Enrico; Mandl, Kenneth D.

In: Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 16, No. 4, e112, 2014, p. 1-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is biblioleaks inevitable?

AU - Dunn, Adam G.

AU - Coiera, Enrico

AU - Mandl, Kenneth D.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - In 2014, the vast majority of published biomedical research is still hidden behind paywalls rather than open access. For more than a decade, similar restrictions over other digitally available content have engendered illegal activity. Music file sharing became rampant in the late 1990s as communities formed around new ways to share. The frequency and scale of cyber-attacks against commercial and government interests has increased dramatically. Massive troves of classified government documents have become public through the actions of a few. Yet we have not seen significant growth in the illegal sharing of peer-reviewed academic articles. Should we truly expect that biomedical publishing is somehow at less risk than other content-generating industries? What of the larger threat-a "Biblioleaks" event-a database breach and public leak of the substantial archives of biomedical literature? As the expectation that all research should be available to everyone becomes the norm for a younger generation of researchers and the broader community, the motivations for such a leak are likely to grow. We explore the feasibility and consequences of a Biblioleaks event for researchers, journals, publishers, and the broader communities of doctors and the patients they serve.

AB - In 2014, the vast majority of published biomedical research is still hidden behind paywalls rather than open access. For more than a decade, similar restrictions over other digitally available content have engendered illegal activity. Music file sharing became rampant in the late 1990s as communities formed around new ways to share. The frequency and scale of cyber-attacks against commercial and government interests has increased dramatically. Massive troves of classified government documents have become public through the actions of a few. Yet we have not seen significant growth in the illegal sharing of peer-reviewed academic articles. Should we truly expect that biomedical publishing is somehow at less risk than other content-generating industries? What of the larger threat-a "Biblioleaks" event-a database breach and public leak of the substantial archives of biomedical literature? As the expectation that all research should be available to everyone becomes the norm for a younger generation of researchers and the broader community, the motivations for such a leak are likely to grow. We explore the feasibility and consequences of a Biblioleaks event for researchers, journals, publishers, and the broader communities of doctors and the patients they serve.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901432058&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2196/jmir.3331

DO - 10.2196/jmir.3331

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - Journal of Medical Internet Research

T2 - Journal of Medical Internet Research

JF - Journal of Medical Internet Research

SN - 1438-8871

IS - 4

M1 - e112

ER -