Abstract
Article 24 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, along with General Comment 4, explicitly outlines the right of every person to an inclusive education at every level. And yet, even amongst supporters of inclusive education, it is not uncommon for some students to be considered ‘too disabled’ to be included. In this research I draw on the views and lived experiences of 10 parents, living in Australia, who identify their children as having been labelled with ‘severe and multiple’ or ‘profound’ impairments. I ask what inclusion means to these parents and their families, and whether inclusion and inclusive education is important to them. Drawing on these parent perspectives, is the notion of inclusive education for everyone realistic and desirable, or only idealistic? Should inclusion be inclusive or is it ultimately conditional? The perspectives of the research participants hold implications for the realisation of the right to inclusive education.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 395-417 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Research Papers in Education |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 4 May 2022 |
Bibliographical note
Copyright the Author(s) 2020. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.Keywords
- Inclusive education
- inclusion
- exclusion
- disability
- students with severe and multiple impairments
- parent perspectives
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Is inclusive education really for everyone? Family stories of children and young people labelled with ‘severe and multiple’ or ‘profound’ ‘disabilities’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver