Abstract
Despite advances in digital technology that have resulted in more people accessing information via mobile devices, little is known about reading comprehension on mobile phones. This research investigated the impact of reading format by comparing sensitivity to misinformation presented either in printed texts or in digital format on mobile phones to readers of English versus Chinese. Participants read pairs of short newspaper-style articles containing a critical piece of information that was either retracted or not retracted, and were later assessed on their memory for critical and general details, as well as inferential judgements related to the retracted information. The average results replicated previous evidence that repeating the original misinformation at the time of retraction enhanced memory updating. However, reading on a mobile phone reduced the likelihood that readers noticed the retraction and updated their memory with alternative information in both language groups and reduced the extent to which inferences were modified by the alternative information in readers of Chinese but not English. Chinese readers showed significantly better general memory, but were more affected by the continued influence of the misinformation. These differences between Chinese and English-speaking participants may reflect cultural influences on the tendency to apply a dialectical rather than an analytic reasoning strategy and incorporate contradictory information into the memory representation of a discourse or event.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1112-1127 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Memory and Cognition |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2020 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- reading comprehension
- mobile phone
- digital format
- continued-influence effect
- misinformation
- Chinese
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Is it smart to read on your phone? The impact of reading format and culture on the continued influence of misinformation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver