Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Squaring theory and evidence

Ken Cheng*, Nora S. Newcombe

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    437 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    There is evidence, beginning with Cheng (1986), that mobile animals may use the geometry of surrounding areas to reorient following disorientation. Gallistel (1990) proposed that geometry is used to compute the major or minor axes of space and suggested that such information might form an encapsulated cognitive module. Research reviewed here, conducted on a wide variety of species since the initial discovery of the use of geometry and the formulation of the modularity claim, has supported some aspects of the approach, while casting doubt on others. Three possible processing models are presented that vary in the way in which (and the extent to which) they instantiate the modularity claim. The extant data do not permit us to discriminate among them. We propose a modified concept of modularity for which an empirical program of research is more tractable.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-23
    Number of pages23
    JournalPsychonomic Bulletin and Review
    Volume12
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2005

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Squaring theory and evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this