It’s complicated: a multi-method approach to broadening participation in STEM

Valerie Gray Hardcastle, Stacie Furst-Holloway, Rachel Kallen, Farah Jacquez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: A lot is known about systemic barriers to broadening participation (BP) in STEM. Empirical research has demonstrated the existence and impact of implicit bias, stereotype threat, and micro-aggressions on a sense of belonging, organizational productivity and leadership opportunities. We also know that achieving greater participation of women and faculty of color in the STEM disciplines is complicated and depends on altering complex and multi-layered interactions between activities and actors. Further, because researcher and institutional goals vary as a function of target population and context, generalizable models can struggle in the face of larger BP efforts. Through the authors experience as an NSF ADVANCE-IT awardee, the authors believe that a dynamic, multi-scaled and organizational level approach is required to reflect the reciprocal dialogue among research questions, best practices, tailored applications and quantifiable goals. The authors describe several examples of research, programming activities and program evaluation that illustrate this approach. In particular, the authors describe both the programming successes and challenges, with the aim of helping others to avoid common mistakes by articulating very broad and, the authors’ hope, generalizable “lessons learned.” The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach: To better understand the barriers for women in STEM, the authors utilized an iterative methodology. Specifically, the authors conducted a social network analysis, an exit survey of departed faculty, longitudinal analysis of career trajectories and research productivity, and a survey on the interaction between values and climate. Findings: The analyses suggest three strategies better retain women in STEM: improve women’s professional networks; re-aling policy documents and departmental practices to better reflect faculty values; and improve departmental climate. Practical implications: The pay-off for using this more complex research approach to triangulate onto specific challenges is that the interventions are more likely to be successful, with a longer-lasting impact. Originality/value: With continuous institutional research, metric refinement, and program evaluation the authors are better able to develop targeted programming, policy reform, and changes in institutional practice. The interventions should result in permanent institutional and systemic change by integrating multi-method qualitative and quantitative research into BP practices, which the authors couple with longitudinal analysis that can quantify success of the authors’ efforts.

LanguageEnglish
Pages349-361
Number of pages13
JournalEquality, Diversity and Inclusion
Volume38
Issue number3
Early online date2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

participation
programming
productivity
climate
Values
methodology
quantitative research
reform policy
interaction
network analysis
research approach
evaluation
aggression
best practice
stereotype
qualitative research
empirical research
social network
dialogue
career

Keywords

  • gender
  • organizational culture
  • higher education
  • career development
  • sciences
  • diversification

Cite this

Hardcastle, Valerie Gray ; Furst-Holloway, Stacie ; Kallen, Rachel ; Jacquez, Farah . / It’s complicated : a multi-method approach to broadening participation in STEM. In: Equality, Diversity and Inclusion. 2019 ; Vol. 38, No. 3. pp. 349-361.
@article{2ebde89c98d94cc6996d49c21dbda12a,
title = "It’s complicated: a multi-method approach to broadening participation in STEM",
abstract = "Purpose: A lot is known about systemic barriers to broadening participation (BP) in STEM. Empirical research has demonstrated the existence and impact of implicit bias, stereotype threat, and micro-aggressions on a sense of belonging, organizational productivity and leadership opportunities. We also know that achieving greater participation of women and faculty of color in the STEM disciplines is complicated and depends on altering complex and multi-layered interactions between activities and actors. Further, because researcher and institutional goals vary as a function of target population and context, generalizable models can struggle in the face of larger BP efforts. Through the authors experience as an NSF ADVANCE-IT awardee, the authors believe that a dynamic, multi-scaled and organizational level approach is required to reflect the reciprocal dialogue among research questions, best practices, tailored applications and quantifiable goals. The authors describe several examples of research, programming activities and program evaluation that illustrate this approach. In particular, the authors describe both the programming successes and challenges, with the aim of helping others to avoid common mistakes by articulating very broad and, the authors’ hope, generalizable “lessons learned.” The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach: To better understand the barriers for women in STEM, the authors utilized an iterative methodology. Specifically, the authors conducted a social network analysis, an exit survey of departed faculty, longitudinal analysis of career trajectories and research productivity, and a survey on the interaction between values and climate. Findings: The analyses suggest three strategies better retain women in STEM: improve women’s professional networks; re-aling policy documents and departmental practices to better reflect faculty values; and improve departmental climate. Practical implications: The pay-off for using this more complex research approach to triangulate onto specific challenges is that the interventions are more likely to be successful, with a longer-lasting impact. Originality/value: With continuous institutional research, metric refinement, and program evaluation the authors are better able to develop targeted programming, policy reform, and changes in institutional practice. The interventions should result in permanent institutional and systemic change by integrating multi-method qualitative and quantitative research into BP practices, which the authors couple with longitudinal analysis that can quantify success of the authors’ efforts.",
keywords = "gender, organizational culture, higher education, career development, sciences, diversification",
author = "Hardcastle, {Valerie Gray} and Stacie Furst-Holloway and Rachel Kallen and Farah Jacquez",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1108/EDI-09-2017-0200",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "349--361",
journal = "Equality, Diversity and Inclusion",
issn = "2040-7149",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing",
number = "3",

}

It’s complicated : a multi-method approach to broadening participation in STEM. / Hardcastle, Valerie Gray; Furst-Holloway, Stacie; Kallen, Rachel; Jacquez, Farah .

In: Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, Vol. 38, No. 3, 15.04.2019, p. 349-361.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - It’s complicated

T2 - Equality, Diversity and Inclusion

AU - Hardcastle, Valerie Gray

AU - Furst-Holloway, Stacie

AU - Kallen, Rachel

AU - Jacquez, Farah

PY - 2019/4/15

Y1 - 2019/4/15

N2 - Purpose: A lot is known about systemic barriers to broadening participation (BP) in STEM. Empirical research has demonstrated the existence and impact of implicit bias, stereotype threat, and micro-aggressions on a sense of belonging, organizational productivity and leadership opportunities. We also know that achieving greater participation of women and faculty of color in the STEM disciplines is complicated and depends on altering complex and multi-layered interactions between activities and actors. Further, because researcher and institutional goals vary as a function of target population and context, generalizable models can struggle in the face of larger BP efforts. Through the authors experience as an NSF ADVANCE-IT awardee, the authors believe that a dynamic, multi-scaled and organizational level approach is required to reflect the reciprocal dialogue among research questions, best practices, tailored applications and quantifiable goals. The authors describe several examples of research, programming activities and program evaluation that illustrate this approach. In particular, the authors describe both the programming successes and challenges, with the aim of helping others to avoid common mistakes by articulating very broad and, the authors’ hope, generalizable “lessons learned.” The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach: To better understand the barriers for women in STEM, the authors utilized an iterative methodology. Specifically, the authors conducted a social network analysis, an exit survey of departed faculty, longitudinal analysis of career trajectories and research productivity, and a survey on the interaction between values and climate. Findings: The analyses suggest three strategies better retain women in STEM: improve women’s professional networks; re-aling policy documents and departmental practices to better reflect faculty values; and improve departmental climate. Practical implications: The pay-off for using this more complex research approach to triangulate onto specific challenges is that the interventions are more likely to be successful, with a longer-lasting impact. Originality/value: With continuous institutional research, metric refinement, and program evaluation the authors are better able to develop targeted programming, policy reform, and changes in institutional practice. The interventions should result in permanent institutional and systemic change by integrating multi-method qualitative and quantitative research into BP practices, which the authors couple with longitudinal analysis that can quantify success of the authors’ efforts.

AB - Purpose: A lot is known about systemic barriers to broadening participation (BP) in STEM. Empirical research has demonstrated the existence and impact of implicit bias, stereotype threat, and micro-aggressions on a sense of belonging, organizational productivity and leadership opportunities. We also know that achieving greater participation of women and faculty of color in the STEM disciplines is complicated and depends on altering complex and multi-layered interactions between activities and actors. Further, because researcher and institutional goals vary as a function of target population and context, generalizable models can struggle in the face of larger BP efforts. Through the authors experience as an NSF ADVANCE-IT awardee, the authors believe that a dynamic, multi-scaled and organizational level approach is required to reflect the reciprocal dialogue among research questions, best practices, tailored applications and quantifiable goals. The authors describe several examples of research, programming activities and program evaluation that illustrate this approach. In particular, the authors describe both the programming successes and challenges, with the aim of helping others to avoid common mistakes by articulating very broad and, the authors’ hope, generalizable “lessons learned.” The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach: To better understand the barriers for women in STEM, the authors utilized an iterative methodology. Specifically, the authors conducted a social network analysis, an exit survey of departed faculty, longitudinal analysis of career trajectories and research productivity, and a survey on the interaction between values and climate. Findings: The analyses suggest three strategies better retain women in STEM: improve women’s professional networks; re-aling policy documents and departmental practices to better reflect faculty values; and improve departmental climate. Practical implications: The pay-off for using this more complex research approach to triangulate onto specific challenges is that the interventions are more likely to be successful, with a longer-lasting impact. Originality/value: With continuous institutional research, metric refinement, and program evaluation the authors are better able to develop targeted programming, policy reform, and changes in institutional practice. The interventions should result in permanent institutional and systemic change by integrating multi-method qualitative and quantitative research into BP practices, which the authors couple with longitudinal analysis that can quantify success of the authors’ efforts.

KW - gender

KW - organizational culture

KW - higher education

KW - career development

KW - sciences

KW - diversification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059668744&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/EDI-09-2017-0200

DO - 10.1108/EDI-09-2017-0200

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 349

EP - 361

JO - Equality, Diversity and Inclusion

JF - Equality, Diversity and Inclusion

SN - 2040-7149

IS - 3

ER -