Journalism and ethics amid the infodemic

Peter Greste*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Amid the COVID-19 pandemic, World Health Organisation (WHO) described what it calls the infodemic—a parallel crisis of information that clouds public debate and exacerbates the impact of the virus. The WHO blamed the way information flows through the internet for creating the infodemic. Other communications theorists have described the way in which the internet is degrading the Constitution of Knowledge—a community of scientists, academics, journalists, lawyers and government figures bound by the traditional liberal values of objectivity, factuality and rationality. Still others describe the way the media’s traditional ‘gatekeeping’ role (bound by similar norms) has been usurped by social media algorithms designed to monetise public attention. This chapter outlines those challenges, assesses what they mean for journalists, and calls for the media to abandon notions of ‘balance’ by giving equal weight to all opinions. It also calls for greater regulation of the internet for social good, and for funding models for journalism that separate it from either political or commercial pressure.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCSR communication in the media
Subtitle of host publicationmedia management on sustainability at a global level
EditorsFranzisca Weder, Lars Rademacher, René Schmidpeter
Place of PublicationCham, Switzerland
PublisherSpringer, Springer Nature
Chapter15
Pages211-221
Number of pages11
ISBN (Electronic)9783031189760
ISBN (Print)9783031189753
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Publication series

NameCSR, Sustainability, Ethics and Governance
ISSN (Print)2196-7075
ISSN (Electronic)2196-7083

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Journalism and ethics amid the infodemic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this