Judaean Embassies and Cases before Roman Emperors, AD 44-66

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

In the two decades before the First Jewish war, litigants or diplomats from the province of Judaea had recourse to Roman emperors on a number of occasions. In some cases the matters at issue involved objections against actions of Roman prefects of Judaea. Evidence about the outcomes of the hearings and diplomatic encounters shows that the emperors Claudius and Nero usually gave decisions in favour of the Jewish side, especially when the Jewish party was the Jerusalem priesthood. It is argued that it was a consistent policy of these emperors to be fair and more than fair to the Jerusalem priests in these years - to the point of ruling against their own procurators on a number of occasions. It is suggested, in view of this, that when the case of Paul of Tarsus came before Caesar in the early sixties, the decision probably went in favour of Paul's accusers.

LanguageEnglish
Pages339-361
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Theological Studies
Volume56
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Judaea
Embassies
Roman Emperor
Jerusalem
Hearing
Diplomats
Sixties
Nero
Emperor
Priesthood
Prefects
Priests

Cite this

@article{2f613c35e14c4c4f890a5f4dbe04669d,
title = "Judaean Embassies and Cases before Roman Emperors, AD 44-66",
abstract = "In the two decades before the First Jewish war, litigants or diplomats from the province of Judaea had recourse to Roman emperors on a number of occasions. In some cases the matters at issue involved objections against actions of Roman prefects of Judaea. Evidence about the outcomes of the hearings and diplomatic encounters shows that the emperors Claudius and Nero usually gave decisions in favour of the Jewish side, especially when the Jewish party was the Jerusalem priesthood. It is argued that it was a consistent policy of these emperors to be fair and more than fair to the Jerusalem priests in these years - to the point of ruling against their own procurators on a number of occasions. It is suggested, in view of this, that when the case of Paul of Tarsus came before Caesar in the early sixties, the decision probably went in favour of Paul's accusers.",
author = "Paul McKechnie",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1093/jts/fli106",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "339--361",
journal = "Journal of Theological Studies",
issn = "0022-5185",
publisher = "OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC",
number = "2",

}

Judaean Embassies and Cases before Roman Emperors, AD 44-66. / McKechnie, Paul.

In: Journal of Theological Studies, Vol. 56, No. 2, 2005, p. 339-361.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Judaean Embassies and Cases before Roman Emperors, AD 44-66

AU - McKechnie, Paul

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - In the two decades before the First Jewish war, litigants or diplomats from the province of Judaea had recourse to Roman emperors on a number of occasions. In some cases the matters at issue involved objections against actions of Roman prefects of Judaea. Evidence about the outcomes of the hearings and diplomatic encounters shows that the emperors Claudius and Nero usually gave decisions in favour of the Jewish side, especially when the Jewish party was the Jerusalem priesthood. It is argued that it was a consistent policy of these emperors to be fair and more than fair to the Jerusalem priests in these years - to the point of ruling against their own procurators on a number of occasions. It is suggested, in view of this, that when the case of Paul of Tarsus came before Caesar in the early sixties, the decision probably went in favour of Paul's accusers.

AB - In the two decades before the First Jewish war, litigants or diplomats from the province of Judaea had recourse to Roman emperors on a number of occasions. In some cases the matters at issue involved objections against actions of Roman prefects of Judaea. Evidence about the outcomes of the hearings and diplomatic encounters shows that the emperors Claudius and Nero usually gave decisions in favour of the Jewish side, especially when the Jewish party was the Jerusalem priesthood. It is argued that it was a consistent policy of these emperors to be fair and more than fair to the Jerusalem priests in these years - to the point of ruling against their own procurators on a number of occasions. It is suggested, in view of this, that when the case of Paul of Tarsus came before Caesar in the early sixties, the decision probably went in favour of Paul's accusers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=63849131597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jts/fli106

DO - 10.1093/jts/fli106

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 339

EP - 361

JO - Journal of Theological Studies

T2 - Journal of Theological Studies

JF - Journal of Theological Studies

SN - 0022-5185

IS - 2

ER -