Judging Alito: the US Supreme Court selection system on trial

Bryan Horrigan

Judging Alito: the US Supreme Court selection system on trial

Bryan Horrigan

Macquarie Law School

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Abstract

JURIST Guest Columnist Bryan Horrigan says that the upcoming confirmation hearings for Judge Samuel Alito are a trial not just of the nominee, but of the uniquely-American system of public judicial confirmations of high court judges.

Original language	English
Journal	JURIST : legal news and research
Volume	6
Publication status	Published - 2006

Cite this

@article{81d357eb07304907938627252ffb5c25,

title = "Judging Alito: the US Supreme Court selection system on trial",

abstract = "JURIST Guest Columnist Bryan Horrigan says that the upcoming confirmation hearings for Judge Samuel Alito are a trial not just of the nominee, but of the uniquely-American system of public judicial confirmations of high court judges.",

author = "Bryan Horrigan",

year = "2006",

language = "English",

volume = "6",

journal = "JURIST : legal news and research",

publisher = "School of Law, University of Pittsburgh",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Judging Alito

T2 - the US Supreme Court selection system on trial

AU - Horrigan, Bryan

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - JURIST Guest Columnist Bryan Horrigan says that the upcoming confirmation hearings for Judge Samuel Alito are a trial not just of the nominee, but of the uniquely-American system of public judicial confirmations of high court judges.

AB - JURIST Guest Columnist Bryan Horrigan says that the upcoming confirmation hearings for Judge Samuel Alito are a trial not just of the nominee, but of the uniquely-American system of public judicial confirmations of high court judges.

M3 - Article

VL - 6

JO - JURIST : legal news and research

JF - JURIST : legal news and research

ER -

Judging Alito: the US Supreme Court selection system on trial

Abstract

Fingerprint

Cite this