Justice and fairness in negotiation

Daniel Druckman*, Lynn Wagner

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

    20 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In this special issue we display a variety of approaches to the study of justice. Articles from scholars working on questions involving justice and fairness in decision making exchanges calls attention to variety of research approaches, issue domains, cases and hypotheses used to explore these questions. All of the contributions emphasize analysis, using quantitative and qualitative methods including simulation-experiments, comparative case studies, statistical analyses and game theory. The articles in this collection reveal that justice and fairness concerns extend from the negotiation process to the outcome and into the implementation stage. They share the underlying expectation that individuals and groups gravitate toward fairness and justice in their exchanges with others. Therefore, a full understanding of group decision processes will be incomplete if justice and fairness issues are not considered alongside issues such as power distributions and alternatives to an agreement. The authors also suggest that outcomes built on justice and fairness principles will enhance the efficiency, stability and implementation of the negotiated agreements.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)9-17
    Number of pages9
    JournalGroup Decision and Negotiation
    Volume26
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2017

    Keywords

    • Distributive justice
    • Fairness
    • Negotiation process
    • Pareto-optimal allocations
    • Procedural justice

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Justice and fairness in negotiation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this